<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama won because of poor GOP Turnout- Census Bureau Data&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.puma08.com/2009/07/21/obama-won-because-of-poor-gop-turnout-census-bureau-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.puma08.com/2009/07/21/obama-won-because-of-poor-gop-turnout-census-bureau-data/</link>
	<description>Party Unity My A...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 19:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Happydaysarehereagain</title>
		<link>http://www.puma08.com/2009/07/21/obama-won-because-of-poor-gop-turnout-census-bureau-data/comment-page-1/#comment-8928</link>
		<dc:creator>Happydaysarehereagain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 21:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puma08.com/?p=2344#comment-8928</guid>
		<description>OK PP, your logic is that a candidate who COULD have gotten a larger share of WHITE voters would have beat Obama?

Did you happen to see the crowds that MCCAIN/PALIN drew? Hello????? They couldn&#039;t have been more WHITER than that. You see, that is the problem you and your fellow bloggers suffer from; They didn&#039;t lose because their turnout didn&#039;t have ENOUGH whites, they lost because their constituents weren&#039;t diverse ENOUGH in thought and values.

The R&#039;s will continue to lose until they become more diversified both in thoughts and in ideas. The voters decided against SP and JM one the &quot;our way or the highway mentality which has crippled the RNC.

When Repubs make it a crime to disagree with group-think and ostracize those who don&#039;t tow the line. That to me is a very scary thought. We can look back at history and find examples of this kind of (mis)behavior.


Thank you for your time. You Betcha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK PP, your logic is that a candidate who COULD have gotten a larger share of WHITE voters would have beat Obama?</p>
<p>Did you happen to see the crowds that MCCAIN/PALIN drew? Hello????? They couldn&#8217;t have been more WHITER than that. You see, that is the problem you and your fellow bloggers suffer from; They didn&#8217;t lose because their turnout didn&#8217;t have ENOUGH whites, they lost because their constituents weren&#8217;t diverse ENOUGH in thought and values.</p>
<p>The R&#8217;s will continue to lose until they become more diversified both in thoughts and in ideas. The voters decided against SP and JM one the &#8220;our way or the highway mentality which has crippled the RNC.</p>
<p>When Repubs make it a crime to disagree with group-think and ostracize those who don&#8217;t tow the line. That to me is a very scary thought. We can look back at history and find examples of this kind of (mis)behavior.</p>
<p>Thank you for your time. You Betcha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan_bro</title>
		<link>http://www.puma08.com/2009/07/21/obama-won-because-of-poor-gop-turnout-census-bureau-data/comment-page-1/#comment-8923</link>
		<dc:creator>dan_bro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puma08.com/?p=2344#comment-8923</guid>
		<description>Yeah, you and all your supporters around here... really delivered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, you and all your supporters around here&#8230; really delivered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

