At times I feel like it's just me against the world...

  • Carmelo Junior

    The only black person with the experience and ability to lead this nation was Colin Powell, yet he cowardely rejected to run. Now he cowardely supported the most inexperienced and naive black candidate just because he was way ahead in the polls. If McCain would have maintained his Sarah Palin lead after the economic meltdown, I bet cha, Colin Powell would be with the fellow veteran.

  • Sparky

    CJ – I’m not so sure about that. McCain should have run a more agressive campaign. He had information on Barry and refused to use it based on Honor.

    There is no honor amongst thieves.

    As for Colin Powell – I truly believe that he was bitter about the UN issue and that he truly believed that Barry O was running an honest campaign. Colin is in no way a liberal – but in this case – he was color blind.

  • Sparky

    CJ – check out this link – it’s about Sarah. There is a reason why Barry and the MSM are scared sh–less of her.

    http://www.trustedpartner.com/docs/library/000143/NBRA%20Tribute%20To%20Palin%20Newsletter.pdf

  • Rozathegreat

    Puma Pundit, please do tell me what your thoughts are on Carmelo’s statement above.

    ~Roza

  • Sheryl

    I love the National Black Republican. I always find it amazing since Martin Luther King was a republican and John Kennedy was against civil rights, and the Republican party abolished slavery, started affirmative action, and the black colleges that it gets lost in history..

    I would love to see Palin and Condy on the same ticket… that’s for sure.

  • badlybehaved

    Go Sarah! The equal rights amendment was a Republican idea.

  • Sparky

    Sheryl/ BB – here is additoinal information relating to the NAACP and the Republican party.

    Rozathesocialist wouldn’t understand it because she would need to go to her father to understand black history questions – she can’t discover it on her own.

    The NAACP celebrates its 100th anniversary this month. During the last forty years this once great civil rights organization has evolved into a hapless flack for the Democrat Party. Once the NAACP was closely aligned with the Republican Party and once the NAACP stood for absolute legal and social equality. Once strong and good black leaders understood which party represented the true principles of unprejudiced and fair legal and political systems. That party was the Republican Party.

    The Republican Party has always been champion of equal rights for blacks in American politics. Lincoln is often cited as evidence of Republican cynicism. He was more concerned with preserving the Union than with ending slavery, but Lincoln was also hostile to slavery, which is why the Southern states seceded. Three Democrats ran against Lincoln in the 1860 election. All three supported slavery. Lincoln was softer on slavery than the rest of his party (which is why he was nominated: Lincoln could carry counties in Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio that a pure abolitionist could not.)

    But the Republican Party, before Lincoln, viewed slavery with horror. Thaddeus Stevens, invariably described in history books as a “Radical Republican,” in 1838 refused to sign the revised Pennsylvania Constitution which disenfranchised blacks- – 22 years before the election of Lincoln. When Stevens died, at his own request, he was buried in a segregated black cemetery with the epithet: “I have chosen this that I might illustrate in my death the principles which I advocated through a long life, Equality of Man before his Creator.”

    Republican Party platforms from 1856 onward refer explicitly to the language of the Declaration of Independence “…that all men are created equal” when discussing race, slavery, or civil rights. The platform of 1872 speaks of “complete liberty and exact equality” when discussing race. The political history of the Democrat and Republican parties after the Civil War was a stark contrast on the issue of race: Republican leaders invariably stood for equal rights for blacks, despite the fact that this not only cost Republicans one third of America (the whole Solid South) but large numbers of bigoted Northern white voters as well.

    When the NAACP was formed in 1909, Fred Miholland, a staunch Republican, contributed $25,000 of his own money to help found it. Black leaders who helped make the NAACP a serious force, like James Weldon Johnson, were active Republicans. Republicans would routinely join the NAACP while Democrats spurned the organization. (Barry Goldwater, in the 1950s, joined the NAACP, also joined the Urban League, and contributed money to test the legality of Phoenix segregation ordinances.) Republican nominated blacks to serve in Congress, selected blacks as delegates and speakers at Republican National Conventions, and appointed blacks to the federal bench.

    What about Democrat leaders? Grover Cleveland appointed Edward White, who had belonged to the Ku Klux Klan, to the Supreme Court. Woodrow Wilson, an avowed racist, re-segregated the federal civil service when he took office. His son-in-law, William McAdoo, was almost nominated by the Democrats after Wilson left office; McAdoo was the favored candidate of the Ku Klux Klan, who held rallies to support him. In 1928 the Democrats held their convention in Houston, where a black had just been lynched. When Al Smith, the Democrat nominee, was asked to speak out against the outrage he refused to say a single word of condemnation.

    Franklin Roosevelt is supposed to have won blacks over to the Democrat Party when he became president. One must ask: Why? In 1932, FDR won the Democrat nomination on the fourth ballot by sweeping the racist Democrat South delegations against the other Democrat candidates for the nomination. President Roosevelt appointed a Klansman, Tom Clark, as Attorney General; he appointed another Klansman, Hugo Black, to the Supreme Court. This so-called “friend of the black man” refused to meet with Jesse Owens in 1936.

    The New Deal exempted jobs performed by blacks from minimum wage laws (promptly the Urban League to state that the New Deal has betrayed blacks.) When the NAACP asked FDR to help tenant farmers in the South and to support anti-lynching laws, Roosevelt refused. In 1944 FDR selected as Vice President Harry Truman, who had signed up to join the Ku Klux Klan (he stopped when he found out it was anti-Catholic.) Almost all Democrat leaders, right through LBJ, had been racists (LBJ in 1947 opposed civil rights legislation, opposed anti-lynching laws, opposed laws banning discrimination in employment, and favored the poll tax.)

    What caused black leaders to embrace men who embraced the vilest enemies of black people? Organizations like the NAACP, over time, changed from movements favoring individual liberty – - the ideals of men like Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington – - into dull organs of the Left. The NAACP simply became a power bureaucracy. Does this mean the NAACP would align with a party built on Ku Klux Klan terrorism? Yes.

    The Left has never had a problem with organizations like the Ku Klux Klan and the Klan has never had problems with the Left. When the Klan was formed, its avowed purpose was to do “justice to the afflicted and oppressed.” The Klan was a strong advocate of public schools and favored laws to ban religious schools. The Klan, like all organs of the Left, was all about crushing the individual and using coercive power to make us all members of herds, bossed by other Leftists.

    Tom Watson is a good example of racists as Leftists. Watson was a radical opponent of private business and industry. When in the Senate, Watson took pride in being the first member to ask the United States to recognize the Soviet Union. Tom Watson was also a strong supporter of the Ku Klux Klan and an anti-Semite. Watson was a “progressive,” like Wilson, and an idol to the Left of his time. Watson and Wilson were followed decades later by Truman, a “liberal” who disliked Jews and blacks.

    The common theme of racism and other forms of Leftism is viewing people not as individuals but as members of a race, a gender, a religion, a political party. The Left is simply a lust for power. Once civil rights became safe and secure, it morphed into an auxiliary of the Left. It ceased really standing for anything except the perpetuation of grievances upon which its power was based. The NAACP, when it fought for true equality alongside Republicans, stood for something very good. One hundred years later, the NAACP has simply become another good idea soured by the unquenchable appetite for of the Left for power.

  • Sparky

    Unfortunately for the black community they choose color versus stance. They will never grow in socialism.

  • Sheryl

    Sparky, thanks for the posting on the NAACP. Profound information. It is amazing also that George Bush has done more for the black population than any other president, but the Dem’s and media could never get that information to the folks. Look at what we have accomplished in Africa alone.

  • Sparky

    Amazing indeed Sheryl. What is even more amazing is that this information is available on the web – yet it is ignored or not acknowledged. To do so would be a slap to the Democratic Party. The party that has been shoving welfare down the black communities throats and letting them know that it is acceptable to take handouts.

    Beyond shameful.

  • Iceman32_89

    Man, Sparky where did you get that?It reads like a right wing pamphlet.For every democrat who you would call a racist you could name a republican.I don’t think any one party can claim civil rights as their own.You’re article seemed to leave out the fact that the first president of the NAACP was a democrat.I don’t think you can break things down party lne.It comes down to individuals and what their beliefs are.
    The dig at Roza was kind of silly.As a black man myself I ask my parents and grandparents what real racism was like.There’s nothing like having the stories told to you first hand.When you read it out of a book you don’t feel the emotion or sense the anguish or feel the helplessness but through it all they remained strong and became succesful despite all of it.My grandmother,who happens to be a republican,told me once to never trust the white man.I asked why and she told me something that I will never forget,she said that wherever the white man has gone he has brought death,disease,and destruction.All I could do is nod my head.I was speechless.It just go to show that party affliation means nothing

  • Iceman32_89

    Wait a sec I just noticed this,in what universe was affirmative action started by the republicans and that JFK was against civil rights?Sure initially he was afraid to support it becauseof the Southern Dems but he came to support it fully.He also supported women’s rights.JFK and LBJ,both dems,did alot during to further civil rights and try to make things equal and the issue of black colleges well we’ll just leave that alone for now

  • Carmelo Junior

    Iceman32_89

    Did you know that the person who started affirmative action was president RICHARD NIXON?????

    Did you know that president Kennedy had the FBI and his CIA following Martin Luther King wherever he went(Not to protect him)?

    Did you know that 100% of JFK cabinet members were all WHITE CHRISTIAN MALES?

  • Iceman32_89

    Richard Nixon championed Affirmative Action in his presidency but it all started with JFK who signed an executive order making it so and LBJ strengthing it with the Civil Rights act of 1964

    And what is it with you and White Christian Males?

  • mbander

    But it must be noted that President Eisenhower introduced the Civil Rights Acts of 1957 and 1960. After 125 hours of 24-hour a day fillibustering by the Democrats it was passed and signed. LBJ and Kennedy worked on strengthening this bill which was AGAIN fillibustered by the Dems.

    I certainly have more respect for the Republicans on race issues. They seem to have more faith in individuals then the Dems who tend to come off as believing African Americans can’t make it on their own.

  • Iceman32_89

    NO doubt about it.The Southern Dems were a racist group.Ironically alot of those dems became republicans under Nixon after LBJ singed the voter rights act in 1965 I believe,my memory is a little rusty and I think that’s why the republican party has the reputation that it has now.It all goes in cyles but there have been people on both sides of the aisle who have contributed tothe civil rights movement so that all men and women can have equal rights

  • Sparky

    Iceman – you are aware that Martin Luther King was a Republican. Try reading the below and learning more about history and the actual facts and not what has been spoonfed to you for years. By the way, I respected my parents and what they told me – although I didn’t consider it gospel like you and Roza do.

    John F Kennedy is not automatically associated with civil rights issues as Kennedy’s presidency is more famed for the Cuban Missile Crisis and issues surrounding the Cold War. Also, no obvious civil rights legislation was signed by Kennedy. However, Kennedy did have a major input into civil rights history – though posthumously.

    However, during the presidential campaign and after he was nominated for the Democrats, Kennedy made it clear in his speeches that he was a supporter of civil rights. Historians are divided as to why he was ‘suddenly’ converted. Some saw the opposition to the 1957 Act as understandable from a political point of view. Others have adopted a more cynical view which is that Kennedy recognised that he needed the ‘Black Vote’ if he was to beat Nixon. Hence why he said in his campaign speeches that discrimination stained America as it lead the west’s stance against the Soviet Union during the Cold War. He also said that a decent president could end unacceptable housing conditions by using federal power. His call of sympathy to Martin Luther King’s wife, Coretta, when King was in prison was well publicised by the Democrats.

    Now as president, Kennedy could either ignore discrimination or he could act. He had promised in his campaign speeches to act swiftly if elected. The 1960 report by the Civil Rights Commission made it very plain in clear statistics just how bad discrimination had affected the African American community.

    57% of African American housing was judged to be unacceptable
    African American life expectancy was 7 years less than whites
    African American infant mortality was twice as great as whites
    African Americans found it all but impossible to get mortgages from mortgage lenders.
    Property values would drop a great deal if an African American family moved into a neighbourhood that was not a ghetto.

    Regardless of his promises, in 1961 Kennedy did nothing to help and push forward the civil rights issue. Why? International factors meant that the president could never focus attention on domestic issues in that year. He also knew that there was no great public support for such legislation. Opinion polls indicated that in 1960 and 1961, civil rights was at the bottom of the list when people were asked “what needs to be done in America to advance society ?” Kennedy was also concentrating his domestic attention on improving health care and helping the lowest wage earners. Civil rights issues would only cloud the issue and disrupt progress in these areas.

    Kennedy also argued that improving health care and wages for the poor would effectively be civil rights legislation as they would benefit the most from these two.

    The 1963 March on Washington was initially opposed by Kennedy as he believed that any march during his presidency would indicate that the leaders of the civil rights campaign were critical of his stance on civil rights. Kennedy also felt that the march could antagonise Congress when it was in the process of discussing his civil rights bill. A march might have been viewed by Congress as external pressure being put on them. Kennedy eventually endorsed the march when it was agreed that the federal government could have an input into it. Malcolm X criticised King’s decision to allow this as he believed that Kennedy was attempting to take over and orchestrate the march. Malcolm X was to nick-name the march “The Farce on Washington”. Historians now view the march as a great success for both King and the federal government as it went well in all aspects – peaceful, informative, well organised etc. The rumours that federal representatives would cut off the PA system if the speeches became too rabble-raising have not been proved.

    Was Kennedy a keen civil rights man? In the immediate aftermath of his death, only praise was heaped on the murdered president. To do otherwise would have been considered highly unpatriotic. However, in recent years there has been a re-evaluation of Kennedy and what he did in his presidency. For a man who claimed that poor housing could be ended with the signing of the president’s name, Kennedy did nothing. His Department of Urban Affairs bill was rejected by Congress and eventually only a weak housing act was passed which applied only to future federal housing projects.

    Kennedy was a politician and he was acutely aware that Democrats were less than happy with a disproportionate amount of time being spent on civil rights issues when the Cold War was in full flight with Vietnam flaring up and the world settling down after the problems poised by Cuba.

    Kennedy was also aware that southern Democrats were still powerful in the party and their wishes could not be totally ignored if the party was not to be split apart – or if Kennedy was not to get the party’s nomination for the 1964 election. However, there is no doubt that the violence that occurred in the South during his presidency horrified and angered him.

    For all the charisma that was attached to Kennedy’ name, he had a poor relationship with Congress and without their support nothing would become an act. Kennedy himself said:

    Kennedy had to tread a very fine line in the South. His popularity by September 1963 showed that his support had dropped to 44% in the South. It had been 60% in March 1963. At this time, the South was a traditional stronghold of the Democrats. Now in 2001, it is all but Republican to a state – and the move started in the presidency of Kennedy and grew from it almost certainly as a rejection of the stance taken by a Democrat president.

    He was also losing support in the north where it was felt that the administration was too concerned with the African Americans and forgetting about the majority of the people – the whites.

    In many senses Kennedy was damned if he did and damned if he did not. If he helped the African Americans in the South, he lost the support of the powerful Democrats there. If he did nothing he faced world-wide condemnation especially after the scenes vividly seen in Birmingham.

    Even civil rights leaders in the South criticised Kennedy for doing too little. In the north, the majority population was white. This group felt that its problems were being ignored while the problems of the African Americans were being addressed. The militant African Americans of the north as seen in the Nation of Islam condemned Kennedy simply because he epitomised white power based in Washington.

  • Sparky

    PP – keep up the good work. You are doing more good on informing people on what is ACTUALLY happening out in the real world.

    Barry and Company will try to convince people that socialism is the way to go. By manipulating the Black Community they are once again suppressing them under the disguise of our government.

    AS PUMAs we stand tall and strong. Pounce, pounce!

  • mbander

    Iceman,

    While you have overly simplified the Dems becoming Republicans statement, you are right that there have been contributors (and detractors for that matter on both sides. The Republicans got that reputation because the Democrats have kept chanting how they have fought every civils rights battle for the African Americans and the Repubs have not. Even though historically that has not been the case, they have apparently been very convincing.

    What is alarming now, is that both parties are now doing everything they can to keep their power. Take this issue of illegal immigration. Do you really think that anyone (the Democrats) who favor amnesty across the board for illegals, despite the huge and unaffordable financial burden, social issues (drug cartels, etc.) is doing it for any other reason than to gain a foothold on what they consider a huge new block of voters? You want to see how fast black issues get put on the back burner, wait until they start pandering to a new minority. Becaue pandering is what they do best.

    Point is, Iceman, very few of these people represent US. They represent themselves and their party first. And I am speaking of both Dems and Repubs. And we need to take this power back. It belongs to us. WE, not them, are the ones who got top billing in the Constitution – “We the People of the United States.”

  • Iceman32_89

    I know the National Black republicans had been making that claim.I seem to recall something on that.I assume you are a part of that group.The fact of matter is no one knows for sure what his party affiliation was and even if he was a repub or a dem who cares??It doesn’t take away from the important work he did not just for blacks but for everybody.No one party can claim civil rights as their own.There have been people on both sides of the aisle that have committed their lives to civil rights.

  • Sparky

    Exactly mbander. They need to clean house – starting with Pelosi!

  • Sparky

    Vanilla Ice – you need some serious history lessons on your Black Heritage. Go to the library, the internet, anywhere and start educating yourself.

    Martin Luther King, Jr. was born on January 15, 1929 at his family home in Atlanta, Georgia. King’s grandfather was a Baptist preacher, and his father was pastor of Atlanta’s Ebenezer Baptist Church. King earned his own Bachelor of Divinity degree from Crozier Theological Seminary in 1951 and earned his Doctor of Philosophy from Boston University in 1955. As a Baptist Minister, he was an eloquent civil rights movement leader from the mid-1950′s until his death by assassination on April 3, 1968 in Memphis, Tennessee where he was there to support striking sanitation workers.

    King registered as a Republican in 1956.

    As pastor of a Baptist church in Montgomery, Alabama, King led a black bus boycott. He and ninety others were arrested and indicted under the provisions of a law making it illegal to conspire to obstruct the operation of a business. King and several others were found guilty, but appealed their case. A Supreme Court decision in 1956 ended Alabama’s segregation laws enacted by Democrats. After this success, King was made president of the newly established Southern Christian Leadership Conference. King led the 1963 March on Washington where he delivered his most famous “I Have a Dream” speech. King became a national hero as he promoted non-violent means to achieve civil rights reform.

    He was awarded the 1964 Noble Peace Prize for his efforts, and President Ronald Reagan made King’s birthday a national holiday.

  • Sparky

    Here is some additional information on the early forefathers of the civil right movements (all Republicans:

    Carter G. Woodson

    (1875 – 1950)

    “Switch parties if you are not being represented.”

    These are the words of Dr. Carter Godwin Woodson, distinguished Black author, editor, publisher, and historian. Carter G. Woodson believed that Blacks should know their past in order to participate intelligently in the affairs in our country. He strongly believed that Black history – which others have tried so diligently to erase – is a firm foundation for young Black Americans to build on in order to become productive citizens of our society.

    Known as the father of Black history, Dr. Woodson at the peak of the Harlem Renaissance established “Negro History Week” in 1926 during the second week of February to commemorate the birthday of abolitionist and orator Frederick Douglass and President Abraham Lincoln. Woodson sought to create a forum that later became Black History Month. He was also instrumental in the founding of the Association for the Study of Negro Life and History in 1915.

    back to top

    Frederick Douglass

    (1817 – 1895)

    Frederick Douglass was one of the foremost leaders of the abolitionist movement which fought to end slavery within the United States in the decades prior to the Civil War. He eagerly attended the founding meeting of the republican party in 1854 and campaigned for its nominees.

    A brilliant speaker, Douglass was asked by the American Anti-Slavery Society to engage in a tour of lectures, and so became recognized as one of America’s first great black speakers. He won world fame when his autobiography The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave, in which he gave specific details of his bondage, was publicized in 1845. Two years later, he began publishing an anti-slavery paper called the North Star. He was appointed Minister Resident and Consul General to Haiti by President Benjamin Harrison on July 1, 1889, the first black citizen to hold high rank in the U.S. government.

    Douglass served as an adviser to President Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War and fought for the adoption of constitutional amendments that guaranteed voting rights and other civil liberties for blacks. After the Civil War, Douglass realized that the war for citizenship had just begun when Democrat President Andrew Johnson proved to be a determined opponent of land redistribution and civil and political rights for former slaves. Douglass began the postwar era relying on the same themes that he preached in the antebellum years: economic self-reliance, political agitation, and coalition building. Douglass provided a powerful voice for human rights during this period of American history and is still revered today for his contributions against racial injustice.

    Booker T. Washington

    (1856 – 1915)

    Rising up from slavery and illiteracy, Booker T. Washington became the foremost educator and leader of African Americans at the turn of the century. Born into slavery, Washington was the most prominent spokesperson for African Americans after the death of Frederick Douglass. After graduation from the Hampton Institute in 1875, he first taught in West Virginia and then studied at the Wayland Seminary before returning to teach at Hampton.

    In 1881 he left Hampton to begin the single most important undertaking of his life: founding the Tuskegee Normal School in Alabama. Washington, his small staff, and their students worked as carpenters to build Tuskegee. In its first year of operation Tuskegee had 37 students and a faculty of three. When Washington died in 1915, Tuskegee had 1,500 students, a faculty of 180, and an endowment of $2,000,000.

    back to top

    A. Philip Randolph

    (1889 – 1979)

    As a Philip Randolph became one of America’s foremost labor leader and civil rights pioneer. He was born in Crescent City, Florida in 1889. In 1925 he organized and served as the first President of the Black International Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters. Randolph was the first African American to serve as an International Vice-President of the AFL-CIO in 1957, and received the Presidential Medal of Freedom from President Lyndon Johnson in 1964.

    He organized two major marches on Washington, D.C. in 1941 and 1963, which resulted in important advances in black civil rights. The 1963 march made Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. into a national figure. About the 1963 March Randolph once said:

    “By fighting for their rights now, American Negroes are helping to make America a moral and spiritual arsenal of democracy. Their fight against the poll tax, against lynch law, segregation, and Jim Crow, their fight for economic, political, and social equality, thus becomes part of the global war for freedom.”

    back to top

    Harriet Tubman

    (1821 – 1913)

    Harriet Tubman was heralded as the “Moses” of black people, leading approximately 300 slaves to freedom during nineteen trips. Her work became even more dangerous with the passage of the Fugitive Slave Law and the offer of awards by slave owners for her capture. She learned about the Underground Railroad which was a secret network of abolitionists, freed blacks, sympathetic whites and Quakers who helped runaway slaves. Tubman became the most influential of the black conductors. After the outbreak of the Civil War, she served with distinction as a soldier, spy, and a nurse, spending time at Fort Monroe, where Jefferson Davis was later imprisoned.

    back to top

    Sojourner Truth

    (1797 – 1883)

    Sojourner Truth was born as a slave in Hurley, New York and became a nationally known speaker on human rights for slaves and women. At the time of her birth, New York and New Jersey were the only northern states that still permitted slavery. After gaining her freedom, she took the name Sojourner Truth to signify her role as a traveler telling the truth about slavery. She set out on June 1, 1843, walking for miles and gaining fame. Truth’s popularity was enhanced by her biography The Narrative of Sojourner Truth: A Northern Slave written by the abolitionist Olive Gilbert, with a preface written by William Lloyd Garrison. She was the first prominent African American woman to become directly involved with the white women’s suffrage movement. She gave her famous speech, “Ain’t I a Woman?” in the 1851 Convention on Women’s Rights in Akron, Ohio in response to a clergyman’s remarks ridiculing women as too weak and helpless to entrust with the vote.

    In 1864, she was invited to the White House, where President Abraham Lincoln personally received her. Later she served as a counselor for the National Freedman’s Relief Association, retiring in 1875 to Battle Creek, Michigan.

    back to top

    George Washington Carver

    (1860 – 1943)

    One of the best known agricultural scientists of his generation, Carver was born into slavery near Diamond Grove, Missouri. Although Carver had to work and live on his own while still a boy, he managed to finish high school and became the first African American student to enroll at Simpson College in Indianola, Iowa. Later earned a Master of Science from the Iowa Agricultural College. In 1896, Carver joined Booker T. Washington at the Tuskegee Institute.

    Carver encouraged Southern farmers to diversify from cotton only and also plant sweet potatoes and peas to end leaching the soil of nutrients. In order to make these crops more profitable, Carver did extensive research, producing more than 300 derivative products from the peanut and 118 from the sweet potato. In 1923 Carver won the Springham award, the highest annual prize given by the National Association for Colored People. In 1938 he took $30,000, virtually his entire life’s savings, and founded the George Washington Carver Foundation to continue his work after his death.

    back to top

    Hiram Rhodes Revels

    (1822 – 1901)

    Hiram Rhodes Revels of Mississippi was the first black United States senator serving from 1870-1871 as a Republican. The only other African American to serve as United States Senators in the nineteenth century was Blanche K. Bruce also a Republicans from Mississippi. Revels completed the unfinished term of Jefferson Davis who was the former president of the confederacy. In the Senate, Revels supported civil rights for blacks. Born in Fayetteville, North Carolina attending Knox College, he became a minister of the African Methodist Episcope Church. After completing his term in the United States Senate, Revels was named president of Alcorn University (now known as Alcorn State University).

    back to top

    Blanche Bruce

    (1841 – 1898)

    Blanche Bruce was elected as a Republican to the United States Senate and served from March 4, 1875 to March 3, 1881. He was the first African American to serve a full term in the United States Senate. He was born in slavery near Farmville, Virginia . At the beginning of the Civil War, he taught school in Hannibal, Missouri and later attended Oberlin College in Ohio. After the Civil War, he became a member of the Mississippi Levee Board, a sheriff and tax collector of Bolivar County from 1872 to1875. He was appointed register of the treasury by President James Garfield in 1881 and was appointed to that position again in 1897. He served as the recorder of deeds for the District of Columbia from 1891to1893.

    back to top

    Ida B. Wells

    (1862 – 1931)

    Ida B. Wells was a journalist, advocate for civil rights and an anti-lynching crusader. She was born in Springfield, Mississippi and helped to found the National Association of Colored Women in 1896 and the Negro Fellowship League. She worked with the white Republicans who started the National Association for the Advancement for Colored People on February 12, 1909.

    She was forced off of a train for refusing to sit in the Jim Crow car designated for blacks and was awarded $500 by a circuit court. That decision was overruled by the Tennessee Supreme Court in 1887, a rejection that ultimately strengthened her resolve to devote her life to upholding justice. She reported in two black newspapers, the New York Age and the Chicago Conservator, about the violence and injustices being perpetrated by Democrats against African Americans. In honor of her legacy, a low-income housing project in Chicago was named after her in 1941, and in 1990, the U.S. Postal Service issued an Ida B. Wells stamp.

    back to top

    Mary Terrell

    (1863 – 1954)

    Mary Terrell was a civil rights pioneer and lifelong political activist who fought for equal rights for African American women. Terrell was born in Memphis, Tennessee in 1863. Both her parents were former slaves, but her father became very successful in real estate, making it possible for her to have a privileged childhood. In 1884 she graduated from Oberlin College and in 1886 began teaching in Washington’s M Street High School (later known as Dunbar High School). She her husband, Robert Terrell, Washington’s first black judge, were the second black family to move into LeDroit Park in 1894.

    In 1896 she began president of the National Association of Colored Women . She was active in the National American Suffrage Organization, and later she became actively involved in the NAACP. At the age of 90 she was still an activist, playing an instrumental role in the boycott of Washington, DC restaurants that refused to serve blacks. She carried that fight to the Supreme Court in 1953, which upheld the right of blacks to equal service in DC restaurants. The decision set in motion the desegregation of the capital. Terrell’s autobiography, A Colored Woman in a White World, is the first full length published autobiography by an American black woman.

  • Sparky

    By the way – you should be really proud you have the two biggest racists as the faces of the black community.

    Jesse Jackson
    Al Sharpton

    The above historical figures is who you have left behind and now your are supporting Black Leaders that promote welfare. They are keeping your community down and you are all letting them – in the name of brotherhood.

    Wake up! They are manipulating you and your people.

    Obama is black also and although he speaks well (as long as he has a teleprompter in front of him) he is doing nothing for blacks, females, other minorities (except for hte Mexican vote) or for that matter the gay community.

  • Happydaysarehereagain

    ICE,

    Please do not let these people sidetrack you into a conversation over which party or president has done more for blacks. It simply doesn’t matter. These are the same idiots who think that all blacks, vote, live, and think as a monolithic group. This is why they believe Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are black leaders and spoeksmen for the black community. They think this is 1960 and all blacks hang on the very next word coming out of the mouths of these two men. The person who made that statement shows just how ignorant they are of the black community.

    SHORT LESSON for the racists and hopelessly ignorant:

    *All blacks do not agree on every issue.
    *Not all blacks are Democrats.
    *While repecting the role Jesse has played in the past, he IS NOT THE NATIONAL SPEAKER FOR BLACKS!
    *As with EVERY other president, Obama WILL and should face criticism by the black community when he screws up.
    *Not every black man is on probation or parole.
    *Blacks don’t take marching orders from preachers, pastors, or school teachers.
    *Not all blacks are looking for government hadnouts.

    So ICE, stick to your guns and don’t let the detractors pull you off topic with straw-man and red herring arguments.