Hamas Planning To Use Part of $900 Million Given By Obama To Start Military Staff College…

Way to go PUMA pundit! This kind of news are never reported in the MSM and the pro Marxist networks. While all this mess is happening, this fraud president is still on full campaign and celebrity mode. What the MSM reports are just stupid ugly manwoman socialist Michelle Obama wearing designer clothes.
I wonder if people realize Obama is just Malcom X and Ernesto Che Guevara inside a black suit.

CJ – they also keep comparing her to Jackie Kennedy and alluding to some sort of throwback to Camelot. Give me a Freak’n Break!

Fortunately most people aren’t buying it.

The only person I can compare Michelle Obama with is Shakill O’neill. They are doing miracles trying to make her look feminine.

Where are the fake PUMAs Obamabots? Are they regreting putting this fraud in office?

Enjoy the first “black” president. 1,340 days left!

HEHE…quite clever and very misleading.If you’re going to blog a lie I would suggest that you don’t link the original article to it.No where in the original article does it mention the 900 million going to Hamas which I know and you know Mr Pundit to not be true.Many nations gave to the Palestinian Authority to help in rebuilding Gaza.Do they all support Hamas and terrorism?

Hey Vanilla Ice – I tried to pull up the most liberal media artical I could so I went to the NY Times on this. There are hundreds of articles on the $900M given to Palestine (wink, wink Hamas) – try reading between the lines.

Go to Google and type in $900M to Hamas.

Hundreds huh? hmm well I don’t count blogs as articles but I looked it up cause it has been a while since I read up on the matter.As I said,previous administrations have given money to the PA through the channels that I have stated up thread.To say that 900 million is going to Hamas is false but we’ll go with your assertion that 900 million went to Hamas.Does that mean that the nearly 3 billion more dollars that was donated by Britain,The European Union and the GCC is also going to Hamas?Are we all supporting terrorism? If so that’s something to be a little pissed off about but then again I think all these other countries wouldn’t be duped so easily out of their money.
What is it you like to say ummm? oh yeah “can’t fix stupid” amen to that,amen

Well well Vanilla Ice – very quick to defend Barry are you – what say you on the pork spending forced through Congress within 24 hours and signed immediately by your messiah.

Let me guess – it wasn’t really pork spending – what will we weave now?

Yes – I am still in agreement in regards to your backwards way of thinking – based on the slow destruction of our country – uh hem – Barry now wants us to disarm our nuclear weapons. It’s like asking the bad guys to put down their guns and we will also – then of course you know who gets shot at the end.

yes, yes Vanilla Ice – you just can’t fix stupid.

N. Korea launched the missile(Yes! It was a missile, not a rocket or a space shuttle.) This thing went down and did not deliver no satellite in space. Young II now can brag of being capable to launch a missile to Alaska. Of course! He won’t launch any missile to Alaska NOW. That was just a test and a threat…and what our puppet president says?? He stands in front of two teleprompters and say he wants to get rid of all nuclear weapons. Yeah, the same thing Malcom X said more than 45 years ago.

Obama is a dreamer. He should be a pacifist and speaker NOT US PRESIDENT!

*sigh*… You people just don’t get it.It’s not about defending anybody.I read a blog that I knew to be a lie and false.It was propaganda sought to enrage and confuse the facts.I wanted to interject honesty and truth into.That’s it.You choose to drink the cherry flavored kool aid that’s given to you and that’s fine but i choose to think for myself and seek out the truth of the matter.

To answer your questions I don’t thnk gtting rid of all the nukes is a good idea not now and not in the world we live in.Given the fact that US and Russia posses about %98 of the nukes in the world however I think its a good idea to lower our stockpiles.I don’t see the harm in that.Must we go back to the stimulus bill?Fine..Semantically speaking Obama was correct in that there were no earmarks in the bill.That’s a fact and that’s been fact checked by all the websites.You can look it up anywhere.Do I like all the spending?Of course not.I think we’re digging a deep hole however there are stories already coming out about how the package has saved jobs and has allowed some business to get back on their feet so it is going to some good.I think its too much.

And Melo I haven’t been able to see all the news but I seem to recall that on several occasions Obama has given stern warnings for North Korea to not fire that missle.No it wasn’t a satellite and of course it didn’t make it into orbit no believes it did not even Kim Jong II.They have a history of acting tough.We’ll see how its handled.

Stern warnings…hahahaha – did he wag his finger at them? Big bad Barry – you know all he has to do is tell other countries what they need to do and they will all abide – because after all…he is the Messiah.

when the messiah comes you’ll know it.As far as I’m concerned Obama is not it.I know you guys enjoy calling him that.I know I don’t,it’s blasphemous.
I would rather a stern warning given and then the UN do what needs to be done rather than storm across into NK and take it by force.I have litle faith in the UN but there is a clear violation here and hopefully NK will be dealt with accordingly

Iceman,

You must show me the websites that debunk the “rumor” that there were 8,000 earmarks in the Stimulus Bill. Haven’t seen that one. Does that mean that here in Iowa we can’t count on the giant job creator that was in there for us? You know the one I mean – $1.7 million for hog odor research? Even Obama finally admitted that there were earmarks.

My husband and I own a small business. The stimulus bill gives a tax credit for small businesses of just over $500. Since it is meant to help “jolt” the economy, imagine how hard it is for us to decide if we should use it to hire more staff, or put an addition on our building. We want to make the right decision. Maybe you have some advice?

As to us digging a hole with all this reckless spending – we are way past that. In the past 6 months almost $40,000 has been added to the tax liability of each household in the USA. Since half of them don’t pay taxes, I’m not sure how that really works out. You will want to save all these arguments for your children when you explain to them how we allowed this to happen and how sorry you are that they won’t live in the same United States we were privileged enough to experience.

Food for thought – Obama saying it doesn’t make it so. Watch what he DOES not what he SAYS.

Exactly mbander….exactly!

wow! 8000 is alot of earmarks.That would be something to be upset about if it were in fact true but since you asked you can check out factcheck.org or politifact.com.They’re pretty good places to start.They’re pretty good non partisan websites that tend to be more accurate than fox news or msnbc.In rechecking I must admit I was wrong when I said there were no ermarks in the final bill.I got my facts wrong apparently the house bill had no earmarks but the senate bill did.There are some intresting facts there so check it out.If you find 8000 earmarks let me know

Please Vanilla Ice – FactCheck.org is in bed with Barry – they are no longer a reliable source. See what their connections are to the Hussein Organization.

Yes – another Chicago connection.

How many people are aware that Senator Obama has ties to Factcheck.org, the “non-partisan” political “fact checking” site, vis-a-vis the Annenberg Foundation? Or that the controversies surrounding Obama, such as his ties to Bill Ayers, a former member of the violent Vietnam War era Weather Underground terrorist group, and the veracity of Obama’s “birth certificate” are both linked to Factcheck and Annenberg.

Another Item that factcheck.org seemed to hide was Barry’s connections to ACORN.

Let me guess Vanilla Ice – ACORN is a worthy organization – right? You support them as well..read on.

Obama Campaign Paid ACORN $800,000, Then Lied About It To The Federal Election Commission

ACORN, or the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, is the well known community organization group closely associated with Barrak Obama. This enterprise, made up of rabid social misfits, far left loons, and violence prone nutcases is associated with so much crime that it is difficult to keep up with the almost daily revelations. For example, ACORN is now implicated in voter fraud in 14 States.

ACORN does not limit themselves to mere voter fraud, but engages in thuggery, intimidation, extortion, trespass, breaking and entering, and financial shenanigans. See for example the results of current Congressional hearings. In one notable instance, one of the founders of ACORN embezzled $948,607. ACORN did not bother to report the crime. Why? Because ACORN spends only other peoples money. They could not care less. No doubt the gang members wish they had beat the culprit to the loot. Oh well. Another day.

One would think that President Obama and the Democrats would want to disassociate themselves from this disreputable organization. Instead, with the full compliance of the Mainstream Media and Democratic politicians, ACORN will now help the Obama Administration with the census. One wonders why the government would ask ACORN to help with Census while another branch is actively investigating ACORN’s shenanigans?

Obama’s early years with ACORN have been widely reported, but little is known as to what Obama actually did, other than arrange for the continual disruption of City Council meetings with ACORN activists. Of course he did say his years with Project Vote, an ACORN shadow organization with exactly the same officers, directors, staff, office, and contributors, were the highlight of his life. But recent Congressional hearings have brought to light very disturbing testimony.

This testimony not only had little impact on the Democratic Chair, Congressman Jerrold Nadler, but he openly tried to stall any further inquiry. Mr. Nadler seems overtly proud of the Democratic Party’s affiliation with this domestic crime group. As for Obama, he is equally open about his affiliation. As he showed when he controversially and uniquely removed the Census from the Commerce Department into his own office, and announced ACORN’s participation. And now something equally troubling:

Organizing For America is the Obama organization charged with calling everyone in Congress to support the bizzare Obama economic bills that no one gets to read until after they become law. Strangely enough, the organization is tied to the White House and not the Democratic party. The members were to go house to house and get your pledge to support President Obama and his policies. Sounds innocent enough. Until you heard them speak.

“The Obama Campaign worked directly with ACORN and the NY Times hid the story: The New York Times articles stopped when Ms. Moncrief, who is a Democrat and a supporter of the President, revealed that the Obama Presidential Campaign had sent its maxed out donor list to Karen Gillette of the Washington, DC ACORN office and asked Gillette and Ms. Moncrief to reach out to the maxed out donors and solicit donations from them for Get Out the Vote efforts to be run by ACORN. Upon learning this information and receiving the list of donors from the Obama Campaign, Ms. Strom reported to Ms. Moncrief that her editors at the New York Times wanted her to kill the story because, and I quote, “it was a game changer”. That’s when Ms. Moncrief telephoned me on October 21, 2008.”

How many more excuses can you come up for this guy?

Obama volunteers hunt budget support in Birmingham, Alabama grassroots campaign

“About 30 volunteers in Birmingham canvassed shopping areas and other high-traffic locations to talk about the need for health care reform, an education overhaul and environmentally friendly energy development.
“If we don’t change these three things in the next 10 to 15 years, America is over as we know it,” Chris DeHaven, told the group of volunteers before they went their separate ways.”
…

“Those who gathered at Kelly Ingram Park in downtown Birmingham were urged to enlist others who share Obama’s vision and to stay away from trying to convert naysayers.

“We’re looking for supporters,” said DeHaven of Hoover, one of the event’s organizers. “We’re not looking for a fight. That will come later, when we have an army.”

The volunteers are part of Organizing for America, the same grassroots, national network credited in large part with Obama’s quick rise from obscurity to president. Birmingham and 11 other sites statewide were part of a national push this weekend by Organizing for America to trumpet Obama’s spending proposal.

Across the metro area, volunteers gave their opinions about why Obama’s plan is good for the country’s future. Then they asked those willing to sign a pledge of support for the budget. Supporters’ e-mail addresses and other contact information were collected, to keep people engaged and to recruit more volunteers.”

Now that is just creepy. As creepy as Obama’s continued and obviously direct, affiliation with ACORN as well as his attempts to include ACORN tactics on a national level are troubling. It demonstrates a profound ignorance of what the role of the President should be. An immaturity bone deep, or a calculated maneuver to manipulate future elections.

umm yeah I thought of that too which is why I cross reference everything with Politifact.com.As far as I know they have no ties to anybody.They both come to similar conclusions.

What are you thoughts of his extending his hands to Iran? A country that has blatently threatened out Navy ships, kidnapped Americans (there are 3 known Americans in Jail now), disregard as Israel as a soverign country and numerous extremists that wants to commit holy wars against anyone outside the Islamic faith?

One more question to you Vanilla Ice – do you lean towards socialism. Happydaze and Rozathesocialist pretty much admitted that socialism is acceptable to them.

Iceman,

Since the Stimulus Bill came to us via an unsearchable pdf document (bypasing the transparency President Hopenchange promised – to say nothing of the 5 days for citizens – or even Congress to review) specific lists of the earmarks are hard to find. But everyone, including Obama eventually admitted there were earmarks but only a few billion. (As Chuck Schumer said “Americans don’t really care about those little porky items.)

If you don’t believe these weasels in Washington are capable of that number of earmarks, go Taxpayers for Common Sense where they have listed in an excel file, the 9308 earmarks in the much smaller Omnibus Bill (hope you don’t have a slow internet connection)

The problem is Obama gained a of of support during the campaign by promising he would NEVER sign a bill with earmarks in it. In his proposed budget even his CABINET have earmark requests. Maybe instead of giving the Queen a copy of his speeches he should have them on HIS iPod where he can review them and see what he promised the American people.

Change you can believe in.

I know the omnibus bill was loaded with earmarks.Was hoping he wouldn’t sign it but knew he would just to get it out of the way.It was something that was done during the previous administration but that’s no excuse to against a promise.He should held fast to what he said and vetoed that bill.

I know earmarks are getting a bad rap now a days but all an earmark is a place holder that designates a sum of money to go to a specific job.I think there are good earmarks that go to worthy projects and help communities grow and create jobs and there are wasteful earmarks such as the one for studying smelly pigs.

Iceman,
And earmark is an expenditure of OUR money that is stuck in another bill (alot of them are in bills that have NOTHING to do with expenditures of any kind) at the very end, to avoid being debated on it’s own merit. The fact that some people may think a particular earmark is worthy is irrelevant. Most of the time, that wasn’t even their intent. Most often they are direct paybacks to campaign contributors and lobbyists. Too bad the average citizen is not represented by lobbyists or recognized for their collective campaign contributions since it is OUR money being passed out to THEIR friends.

Obama promised he would end this practice. These earmarks were not attributable to the past administration, but the last Congress. He could have shown some integrity by sending it back, and proving he meant what he said. Instead he showed that he has very little regard or respect for the American people – he has the same disdain for us as most of the rest of the weasels in Washington. If that were not true, he would have kept his word – would not have been that hard. This is not change – this is politics as usual.

Based on your attitude, I assume you are one of those mentioned by Schumer that “doesn’t care about the porky projects.” I care very deeply and judging by the Tea Parties around the country, it’s not just me.

Let’s see the stand he takes on the pork filled budget. We’ll see who he cares about – his buddies and the insiders, or the people he pretends to represent. He couldn’t be a bigger phoney.

Vanilla Ice – doesn’t it bother you that your taxes will be raised to pay for those “pesky” ear marks.

Pelosi has been force feeding the ear marks into Bush’s bills for the past 3 two years because she knew he needed more money for the military and the war.

Perfect opportunity to set him up for the fall and keep the momentum building for Barry for the election.

Do you believe in Capitalism? I fear that our free market is going to collapsed on the wasteful spending by the government. $12 Trillion dollars spent in 90 day. He only spoke of $3 Trillion and hid the cost of future committed monies.

Doesn’t that seem like a lot of money for the first 90 days. What in the world will he spend in the next 3.5 years.

He is bankrupting the dollar and will soon have us on a universal currency (just like Russia and China want us to).

Are we no longer a world power. Is it just Russia and China now that he has backed down on our nuclear protection, bankrupted our country and put our American citizens to sleep with his subliminal messages.

Is this where you see the United States of America?

Are you selling out the country based on color. This country was built on multiple races, but with one religion, christianity and he stated that were weren’t built on one religion.

Read the documents from our forefathers, all with the reference in God we trust. Not Allah….GOD!

Of course I care about the earmarks but I think there are bad earmarks and good earmarks.The study of pig odor is a prime example of a bad earmark and it needs to go.The Omnibus bill was left over from the previous adminstration and was loaded up with pork.I did not like the bill and felt it should have been vetoed.I was disappointed when it wasn’t.

What previous administration – the legislative branch writes the bill – the President signs it.

It was the Democrats that forced this crap down the American public – pork bills were and were always snuck in there. Otherwise who would sign these bills as stand alones.

Read Vanilla Ice…read

Feb. 25 (Bloomberg) — The U.S. House voted to boost spending on domestic programs by 8 percent, ease restrictions on travel to Cuba and kill a school voucher program in Washington, D.C., as part of a $410 billion spending bill.

The “omnibus” bill, approved 245-178, combines nine appropriations measures to fund the federal government through September, the end of its fiscal year. Democrats said the spending increase, on top of a $787 billion economic stimulus package signed last week, was needed to make up for tighter budgets during the Bush administration.

“We need to turn the page once and for all on the last eight years,” said Representative James McGovern, a Massachusetts Democrat. “I’m glad that we have reversed the Bush cuts on domestic priorities.”

Republicans criticized the spending increase as unaffordable while the government is projected to run a deficit topping $1.2 trillion. They also said the bill contradicted President Barack Obama’s pledge to rein in the federal deficit.

“I’m embarrassed by this omnibus spending bill,” said Representative Jerry Lewis of California, the top Republican on the House Appropriations Committee. “Even as the president talks about the need to put our economic house in order, this House continues to spend and spend and spend and spend. Clearly the Congress has lost its way.”

Disagreement With Bush

Sixteen House Republicans voted for the bill; 20 Democrats opposed it. The bill heads to the Senate, where Majority Leader Harry Reid said today he wants to complete work on it by the end of next week, when stopgap funding runs out.

The measure would complete budget work Democrats postponed last year when they were unable to agree with then-President George W. Bush on spending. Bush wanted to freeze most domestic spending. Democrats balked, figuring they could get a better deal from Bush’s successor.

Obama plans tomorrow to send Congress his first budget request for the fiscal year beginning in October. Earlier this week, he convened a summit at which he pledged to cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term.

The omnibus bill would reverse a number of Bush administration policies. It would let people visit relatives in Cuba once a year rather than once every three years. It also would undo restrictions enacted in 2005 on food and medicine sales to the communist nation.

The spending bill would end a voucher program in Washington, D.C., providing scholarships to low-income children to attend private schools. It would halt a program letting Mexican trucks operate widely in the U.S. and drop Bush administration plans to double the size of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.

31 Percent Increases

The Consumer Product Safety Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission would get 31 percent funding increases, while the Food and Drug Administration’s budget would grow by 19 percent.

Other initiatives slated for increases include Pell college tuition grants, the National Institutes of Health and aid for low-income housing programs. The budget for the House of Representatives itself would increase by 10 percent while funding for Senate operations would grow by 8 percent.

The legislation also includes almost $8 billion for 8,500 congressional pet projects known as earmarks, according to the Washington-based Taxpayers for Common Sense. Among the earmarks are $1.8 million for swine odor and manure management research in Iowa, $2 million to promote astronomy in Hawaii and $381,000 for music programs at New York City’s Lincoln Center.

The bill is H.R. 1105.

Interesting Vanilla Ice that you have become so quiet. Learning your history is a lot to swallow considering you’ve been spoonfed crap all of your life.

Hopefully this will open your eyes a little wider in the world and not have so much tunnel vision.