<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barack Obama Claims Banks Not Nationalized, Banks Beg To Differ&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.puma08.com/2009/03/11/barack-obama-claims-banks-not-nationalized-banks-beg-to-differ/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.puma08.com/2009/03/11/barack-obama-claims-banks-not-nationalized-banks-beg-to-differ/</link>
	<description>Party Unity My A...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 19:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sparky</title>
		<link>http://www.puma08.com/2009/03/11/barack-obama-claims-banks-not-nationalized-banks-beg-to-differ/comment-page-1/#comment-8490</link>
		<dc:creator>Sparky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puma08.com/?p=1760#comment-8490</guid>
		<description>CJ - I believe that even the moderate Democrats are being to smell a rat.  See below on AP article posted today:

Confronting misgivings in his own party, President Barack Obama mounted a stout defense of his blueprint to overhaul the national economy Thursday, arguing that delay on health care, energy and education would make &quot;recovery more fragile and our future less secure.&quot;

The president&#039;s wide-ranging proposals in the midst of economic crisis faced skepticism from both Democrats and Republicans, as senators questioned his long-term budget outlook and the deficits it envisions in the middle of the next decade.

Sen. Kent Conrad, the chairman of the Budget Committee called the track of future deficits &quot;unsustainable&quot; and singled out Obama&#039;s proposal for spending $634 billion on health care over the next 10 years.

&quot;Some of us have a real pause about the notion of putting substantially more money into the health care system when we&#039;ve already got a bloated system,&quot; said Conrad, D-N.D.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, testifying before Conrad&#039;s committee, also encountered blunt questions about the administration&#039;s plans for shoring up the nation&#039;s banks. He reiterated the administration&#039;s goal to lay out a private-public partnership to make up to $1 trillion in financing available to help banks clear their books of toxic, mortgage-related assets that have led to a national credit freeze.

Geithner hinted more money might be required beyond the existing $700 billion financial rescue fund. &quot;We certainly can start with the resources we have,&quot; he said.

Meanwhile, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., played down talk that Democrats would consider a second economic stimulus bill.

&quot;I know that people have made suggestions that we should be ready to do something, but I really would like to see this stimulus package play out,&quot; Pelosi said. &quot;It&#039;s just not something that, right now, is in the cards,&quot; she added later.

The flurry of comments illustrated the complicated moving parts confronting Washington as the economy continues to decline, credit remains clogged and a new president advances broad and expensive initiatives. The money set aside to address those needs so far has been staggering _ $787 billion for an economic stimulus designed to save and create jobs, the $700 billion approved by Congress for the financial rescue package and hundreds of billions more through programs from the Federal Reserve Bank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CJ &#8211; I believe that even the moderate Democrats are being to smell a rat.  See below on AP article posted today:</p>
<p>Confronting misgivings in his own party, President Barack Obama mounted a stout defense of his blueprint to overhaul the national economy Thursday, arguing that delay on health care, energy and education would make &#8220;recovery more fragile and our future less secure.&#8221;</p>
<p>The president&#8217;s wide-ranging proposals in the midst of economic crisis faced skepticism from both Democrats and Republicans, as senators questioned his long-term budget outlook and the deficits it envisions in the middle of the next decade.</p>
<p>Sen. Kent Conrad, the chairman of the Budget Committee called the track of future deficits &#8220;unsustainable&#8221; and singled out Obama&#8217;s proposal for spending $634 billion on health care over the next 10 years.</p>
<p>&#8220;Some of us have a real pause about the notion of putting substantially more money into the health care system when we&#8217;ve already got a bloated system,&#8221; said Conrad, D-N.D.</p>
<p>Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, testifying before Conrad&#8217;s committee, also encountered blunt questions about the administration&#8217;s plans for shoring up the nation&#8217;s banks. He reiterated the administration&#8217;s goal to lay out a private-public partnership to make up to $1 trillion in financing available to help banks clear their books of toxic, mortgage-related assets that have led to a national credit freeze.</p>
<p>Geithner hinted more money might be required beyond the existing $700 billion financial rescue fund. &#8220;We certainly can start with the resources we have,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., played down talk that Democrats would consider a second economic stimulus bill.</p>
<p>&#8220;I know that people have made suggestions that we should be ready to do something, but I really would like to see this stimulus package play out,&#8221; Pelosi said. &#8220;It&#8217;s just not something that, right now, is in the cards,&#8221; she added later.</p>
<p>The flurry of comments illustrated the complicated moving parts confronting Washington as the economy continues to decline, credit remains clogged and a new president advances broad and expensive initiatives. The money set aside to address those needs so far has been staggering _ $787 billion for an economic stimulus designed to save and create jobs, the $700 billion approved by Congress for the financial rescue package and hundreds of billions more through programs from the Federal Reserve Bank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carmelo Junior</title>
		<link>http://www.puma08.com/2009/03/11/barack-obama-claims-banks-not-nationalized-banks-beg-to-differ/comment-page-1/#comment-8487</link>
		<dc:creator>Carmelo Junior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puma08.com/?p=1760#comment-8487</guid>
		<description>Sheryl

Bob Beckel and other Obamamaniacs(like the ones who participate in this forum) deny that this man Obama is a socialist. If only they could go back to history and see that what this man is doing is the same thing Marx preached and Lenin executed. Everything this man does matches! His stance on religion, his stance on national security, economy. What he said about a &quot;civilian Security force as strong as our Armed Forces&quot;.
This demagogue is what the extreme left needed: appeal, charisma, youth, voice and being the first &quot;black&quot; president was a big plus.

To defeat this formidable adversary we need some one with the same or even more star appeal that can send the message to the American people and unmask this fraud before is too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheryl</p>
<p>Bob Beckel and other Obamamaniacs(like the ones who participate in this forum) deny that this man Obama is a socialist. If only they could go back to history and see that what this man is doing is the same thing Marx preached and Lenin executed. Everything this man does matches! His stance on religion, his stance on national security, economy. What he said about a &#8220;civilian Security force as strong as our Armed Forces&#8221;.<br />
This demagogue is what the extreme left needed: appeal, charisma, youth, voice and being the first &#8220;black&#8221; president was a big plus.</p>
<p>To defeat this formidable adversary we need some one with the same or even more star appeal that can send the message to the American people and unmask this fraud before is too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sparky</title>
		<link>http://www.puma08.com/2009/03/11/barack-obama-claims-banks-not-nationalized-banks-beg-to-differ/comment-page-1/#comment-8486</link>
		<dc:creator>Sparky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puma08.com/?p=1760#comment-8486</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll support you on that one Sheryl.  While we are at it - PUMA Pundit can be pulled in as another campaign writer!

Well done CJ and PP!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll support you on that one Sheryl.  While we are at it &#8211; PUMA Pundit can be pulled in as another campaign writer!</p>
<p>Well done CJ and PP!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheryl</title>
		<link>http://www.puma08.com/2009/03/11/barack-obama-claims-banks-not-nationalized-banks-beg-to-differ/comment-page-1/#comment-8484</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 05:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puma08.com/?p=1760#comment-8484</guid>
		<description>Perfectly stated CJ, - May I be your campaign manager? We need a candidate that can spell it all out just like you did for the American people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfectly stated CJ, &#8211; May I be your campaign manager? We need a candidate that can spell it all out just like you did for the American people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carmelo Junior</title>
		<link>http://www.puma08.com/2009/03/11/barack-obama-claims-banks-not-nationalized-banks-beg-to-differ/comment-page-1/#comment-8482</link>
		<dc:creator>Carmelo Junior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 04:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puma08.com/?p=1760#comment-8482</guid>
		<description>Controling the banks is the first step to establish a dictatorship. Once you have the banks in your hands, your treasury department can seize control of all revenues, the common market system resides on the ability of the dictatorship to dictate how money is spent. Now, by using the media(propaganda) a dictator can control the masses by using the seized revenues to control the market for his own interests(economic stimulus). Then, once the two major forces of a country are seized(media and revenue) the dicator is free to modify the laws(Constitution),  the life of people(Civilian Security Force) and more important, replace God and faith for repulsive secularism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Controling the banks is the first step to establish a dictatorship. Once you have the banks in your hands, your treasury department can seize control of all revenues, the common market system resides on the ability of the dictatorship to dictate how money is spent. Now, by using the media(propaganda) a dictator can control the masses by using the seized revenues to control the market for his own interests(economic stimulus). Then, once the two major forces of a country are seized(media and revenue) the dicator is free to modify the laws(Constitution),  the life of people(Civilian Security Force) and more important, replace God and faith for repulsive secularism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

