At times I feel like it's just me against the world...

  • Carmelo Junior

    As the first “black” president(Malcom X, Jr) soars with big approval numbers and popularity the market can’t just trust this guy like the Obamabots are doing. The market refuses to give in to socialism. The community organizer smiles at huge crowds in the never ending campaign mode. US troops are still dying in Iraq, civillians are still dying in Iraq, suicide killers are still operating there, Iran, Syria, Venezuela, N. Korea and other “tiny countries” are showing their teeth, Putin and Mendevev are threatening to start another Cold War while the One is telling our enemies when and how he is going to retrieve and disarm the most powerful nation on earth.

    This man is as scary as it comes.

    Our community organizer with ZERO military or command experience other than giving demagogic speeches signs autographs and shows arrogance while the future of this country is at stake.

    The question is when is the expected crash will happen? When all these factors with collide to bring down this socialist and incompetent experiment? 2010, 2011 or 2012?

    I mean Oratory and demagogy can’t cover facts forever.

  • Happydaysarehereagain

    Seems somethings NEVER change.

    I go away for a little while and what do I find when I return????

    CARMELO WRITES:

    “As the first “black” president(Malcom X, Jr)”

    I see he’s still hung up on race. Too bad, the world is still moving and some of us are stuck in our ignorance.

  • Sparky

    Oh really Happydaysaregone? Have you looked at our fearless leader lately – are you happy with what you see, because if you agree with him stealing billions of dollars from us tax payers you are the most ignorant man on earth.

    Congrats – you wanted change – well that’s all he’s leaving us with.

  • Iceman32_89

    Melo is all about the race thing.Seems to be his number one issue.

    As far as the spending I don’t like it at all myself but the alternative is doing nothing and that would probably be worse.The CBO warned Bush that signing those tax cuts into law would create a huge deficit.You can’t cut taxes across the board and fight two expensive wars.That’s just basic math.The spend now and worry about the consequences later type attitude is what has gotten into this mess.The Stimulus bill, if anybody took a little time to read it instead of listening to the talking points from either side,has a decent mix of tax cuts and spending to hopefully spur along the economy.Whether its enough is tough to say and nobody knows.It’s a wait and see situation.

  • Sparky

    VanillaIce – Bush was already preparing to exit. The USA has quietly been returning troops for the past years with notifying the enemy. On the otherhand Obozo gave a date (probably a time and place) to the enemy so that they can attack what military we have left over there in the peacekeeper role. Brilliant – oh so not!

    This man is beyond stupid. Yeah I said – beyond stupid.

    He is disbanding our CIA operatives oversees and will be detailing to the public what we use for procedures. In the interim he is releasing known terrorists.

    He is opening up our borders again – all the while he is stealing OUR money and spending it like there is no tomorrow until he completely breaks this country.

    We will be defenseless and broke. He can’t blame this on Bush.

    I guess with Obama you just can’t fix stupid.

  • Iceman32_89

    I guess the surge at the begining of 07 was a way to get the troops out.I can see how that works(eye roll)

    Disbanding our CIA operatives overseas would be stupip.I never heard him say that.I did read the executive order that called for the closure of black op sites but that’s under review for the next 6 months.I think Obama will decide to keep them open.I know you like to blame everything on Obama but troop levels and troop withdrawl are openly discussed.It’s no big secret.It’s common knowledege that we use the army field manual when it comes to interrorgations of enemy combatants.Torture is not in there however there has been a debate on what torture is which is why the field manual is under review as well.
    Just to point out a little something but this country is already broke.We’ve been broke for a long time.We’ve been borrowing from the Chinese for a looooong time and we give them IOU’s in the form of treasury bonds.
    Hopefully the time will never come when they call in those markers cuz then we’re truly screwed.

    I noticed you like to call people “stupid” alot.I have found that people who do that are just projecting

  • Sparky

    Not true Vanilla Ice. You are correct in the fact that China does own all of our debt – sad but true. This has been going on far longer than George Bush.

    I question the continuous bail out monies of bank. Just how much do you put into a bad investment.

    Who is speaking out on our behalf – Pelosi? Obama?

    Unfortunately VanillaIce you are so besotted with this man you can not admit to his faults. It is scary and at the same time ridiculous.

    I call it as I see it. A spade is a spade.

  • Iceman32_89

    besotted huh..now there’s a word you don’t hear too often.I’m somewhat impressed.I’ll always admit to his faults.I’ll always call it like I see it but reading the half truths and talking points that are regurgitated on here make me want to say something.I actually liked McCain.I also like Hillary.Never did know alot about Obama but I’m learning.

    I agree about the money going to the banks.I don’t like it either.I work very hard for my money and to see it go to possible waste concerns me BUT if the big banks fail the run on the banks would be huge and would put a tail spin on the economy that we would never get out of.The government would then nationalize the banks no doubt about.It would be the only option left.Small banks are going under now.It’s terrible for the communities that those banks are in but at least the FDIC is able to cover them.
    I don’t agree with everything Obama says or does but I want my president to succeed and I stand behind him.

  • Carmelo Junior

    This election between McCain and Obama was all based on race. You must be on drugs not to see that. The White Guilt played big time. Howcome people will reject a well qualified man just because he was old and white for a ZERO experience guy just because he was black and young?

  • Iceman32_89

    In your head if McCain wins its because he’s the most experienced and deserved to win but since Obama won it’s because he’s black.It couldn’t possibly be because the country wanted to go into a different direction and that the majority of people felt that he was qualified to be president?I don’t think you can have it both ways.

    I think as a whole race does not matter.I believe people vote for who they believe in and with whom they share the same ideals and philosophies.However,there is that small minority who will vote based on race.There are those who voted for McCain cuz he’s white and those who voted for Obama cuz he’s black but I think its a wasted vote and really small minded.

  • badlybehaved

    Surely we can’t ignore the fact that the Thomas/Hill Hearings overseen by Joe Biden illustrated that ANY Man(even a Black one) is better than a women, even if she is the best candidate. African-American men got the right to vote 50 years before any women did. Work to ratify the ERA so that qualified women of either party aren’t subjected to “Iron my Shirt and Sarah Palin is a c**t t-shirts. McCain spoke against the racism. Obama didn’t address the sexism and misogyny because it was helping him win.

  • mbander

    Iceman,

    I am guessing that you are very young – 18-22 years. Please believe me that I mean that as no insult,but you are not very discerning in a number of your views. You need to look more at what is being DONE than what is being SAID. These Washington folks have a strange way with the truth.

    You talk about people only using talking points, yet you are offering no more than Obama’s talking points. You implied that you read the Stimulus Bill – good for you if you did – the people who voted on it didn’t have the decency to do the same. But you mention that that it contains a good mix of spending and tax cuts for stimulus. Obama touted this as an infrastructure bill for job creation, and yet that spending was only 17% of the whole bill. As to the tax cuts, maybe you can tell me exactly what they are – even the recovery.gov site doesn’t make that very clear.

    The CBO warned about this bill, that it was ineffective short term and would actually damage the economy long term. It was an insult to all of us to put a bunch of wasteful projects in there and also bail out irresponsible state governments and call it stimulus. If they are going to ask US to be responsible, aren’t you offended that THEY don’t have to be? Or are you one of those who Senator Chuck Schumer said doesn’t really care about all the pork in the bill? I care deeply.

    I think that those of us who PAY taxes (Obama’s buddies and other cheats excluded) pay plenty. I am certainly not in a high tax bracket, but I don’t agree that the wealthy are not paying their fair share. Why should the government get half of ANYONE’s income?? What right do they have to it?

    Or maybe we should tax the evil corporations? Well who do you think pays THOSE taxes? Yep, WE do. The government should have to live within their means just like we have to. We need to recognize that a bigger government is NOT the answer. Now we have the new Obama budget which cost every tax filer over $25,000. (I am not sure how that REALLY works out since 40% of the filers don’t even pay taxes.) Jeez $25K per taxpayer would take care of your mortgage, healthcare, and give you a nice vacation and remodel of your home. It is despicable that they believe they can do better with OUR hard earned money than we can.

    Trust but verify

  • Carmelo Junior

    Iceman32_89

    Maybe you don’t know how naive you sound here. Did you ever follow the presidential race from 2007? The race did not start on the summer of 2008 when the media and the Obamabots when on the tank for Che Obama!

    Obamabots accused Hillary and Bill Clinton of being racists just because they brought the race issue to the campaign. Obama brought the race issue but he was not called racist. Only a non black person who bring the race issue is racist.

  • Happydaysarehereagain

    ICE,

    Let me commend you on stating FACTS and not TALKING POINTS. I agree with most of the points you make. I would like to tell you that you are correct in stating (you know who) is all about race. This Prez’s victory has made this person very bitter and pitiful. It is a waste of time to expect anything meaningful (or factual) from this human.

    As for those who like to use to the tag “stupid” in their reference to others, you hit the nail on the head. If I am debating, discussing, or even trying to get you to see my side, I wouldn’t use the term stupid in referring to you. This is a classic error in debate. It shows the weakness of my argument and exposes my lack of intellect.

    ICE, keep in mind this site was originally for other purposes. It has been changed into the HATE/BLAME OBAMA and BASH DEM site. It will rarely, IF EVER, offer alternatives to bills/laws/proposals by Obama. It will bash the hell out of ideas the majority of the country supports. The attacks you are under only come becuase you make valid points. Most of these posters are disenfranchised (R) who sat back and had their chests poked out for GWB while he put us in this mess. They staunchly defended this man who wrecked the economy and had no clue whatsoever about war. Now that there is a new sheriff in town (one they didn’t vote for) they will spend the next four years espousing every crack-pot, fringe conspiracy theory they can to try to convince themselves that Obama is bad for the nation.

    Keep up the fight for truth, ICE!

  • badlybehaved

    Eight years ago the so-called majority of the country supported Bush. I see very little difference between them when it comes to character. Obama used Bush’s dirty tricks times two to win the nomination and then the election.
    I consider most of the arguments here part of the little picture. The details that serve to distract form things like moving the oversight of the census to the White House. The DNC used voter disenfranchisement to secure the nomination for Obama; Obama won the caucus states by fraudulent means and then went on to do the same for the general election. Obama will hire the now unemployed ACORN workers to do the census count. It’s interesting that you boys are coming to this site and talking about whether or not there was racism in the elections and pointedly ignore the sexism. Why am I once again not surprised.

  • Happydaysarehereagain

    Badly,

    First of all let me state that there are huge differences between Bush and Obama. I know this is a Bash Obama website, so I won’t even try to argue any points to his credit. But to say a man who wrecked an economy and put us into 2 wars is the same as someone who says he wants to fix the problems created by GWB is extreme AT BEST!

    On your point about dirty tricks, I won’t waste my time arguing with you because you fail to hear what the people who voted for Obama said. Instead, you wish to ignore what they said and believe what you want to believe about why someone else did what they did. That is the same as you washing your car and me saying you did it because it is Monday, all the while you are saying you did it because the car was dirty. Go figure, Ignore them if you will, it will happen again until people come to understand
    that until all sides LISTEN to the other without ascribing motives, this nation will always be polorized!

    I personally, and millions of other Americans believe Obama won, fair and square. Like it or not! You have a different point of view. No point you are going to make is going to change the fact the he is the POTUS. You can spend every waking moment you have left on earth denouncing this man. That is your right. You can choose to attack his character. That too is also your right. However, you must understand that it is my right to disagree with you and to point out flaws in your logic.

    Regarding sexism. A few jerks along the campaign make sexists remarks, a few make racist remarks, do I attach any of these jerks to the candidates? No, I don’t! I don’t see racists behind every tree and I don’t go looking for them either. To insist that any candidate lost because of sexism is a weak argument AT BEST! This was a tough and brutal campaign on both sides. I will not attack you for believeing that sexism played a major role in the election. That is your right. But, if the majority of voters are women, and the majority of voters are Democrats, and oh never mind. Sexism is and was a red herring in this election! Done!

  • badlybehaved

    I disagree with Sparky calling you stupid; Stupid can’t be helped; you choose to be ignorant…you are also as arrogant as your Messiah. Let’s all have a white boy define racism and sexism for us.

  • Happydaysarehereagain

    badly,

    I’m sure somewhere in that diatribe was a point on the topic???? Anywhoo, let’s proceed:

    ARROGANT – ADJECTIVE: 1. Having or displaying a sense of overbearing self-worth or self-importance. 2. Marked by or arising from a feeling or assumption of one’s superiority toward others: an arrogant contempt for the weak.

    I am only important to me any my family. I do not attack those who do not agree with me or belittle their opinions. I say it is worse to twist facts, use half-truths and out right lies to attack someone’s character than it is to be arrogant. the last statement….
    **Let’s all have a white boy define racism and sexism for us.**

    I have no lcue what you mean. Please explain…

    BTW my messiah is Jesus Christ. Who is yours?

  • badlybehaved

    Is that you Matt? The boy who knew all about women because he took Women’s studies. I find Bush and Obama’s character very similar. I vote on character though there isn’t that often any choice. You see character goes beyond words and is more difficult to disguise. If you had been following this site all along you would be aware of the crap Obama pulled even way back in Chicago. But you arrogant little pip-squeak are now coming here and assuming to define the people who post here. You ASSume to define what the topic is as well as sexism and racism. The original intention of this site was Party Unity My Ass; we refused to toe the party line and drink the kool-aid. You don’t have a clue because you are clueless. So JC is your Messiah do you also agree with the subservient role assigned to women by Christian Denominations?

  • Happydaysarehereagain

    CLUE

  • Happydaysarehereagain

    Badly,
    Is seems I touched a nerve somewhere so let me put it plainly: I am a believer in Christ Jesus. I try to follow God’s word, not man’s. Therefore, when you make comparisons between people’s character, it should be defined in narrow terms. Is this person a good and just person? Is this person evil or not? Dont’ confuse character with politics.

    You see, I don’t put my trust in man, but in God. Not only are you less liekly to be disappointed, but you will have a solid foundation in God’s word!

    I agree wholeheartedly with the word of God. I am not on a crusade to rid the world of perceived evils. You want to blame the church, sexism and society for the roles women take up or have been assigned in the church, you are free to do so. Just don’t expect every church going woman to adhere to your anti-God rhetoric. You will find that your view point in WELL out of the mainstream.

    I guess that is the binding substance for quite a few on this site; thoughts well outside of the mainstream are good, and any opposing group-thought is arrogant. That my friend sounds so cultish and creepy, you really should reread and then rewrite your last post.

  • Happydaysarehereagain

    Badly, on another topic (sort of)

    It is my belief that a person who doesn’t speak out AGAINST every type of injustice (AS OPPOSED TO JUST ONE)is really just a selfish person who shouldn’t be an adovocate for any cause. If for example my cause or concern were equality or women’s rights and I stood by while others were being attacked (by racism, hatred, or xenophobia) I would feel that it is my obligation to also carry the banner to stamp out discrimination in any form.

    Some do not see it that way. They would gladly stand by and witness other spew racism and intolerance while keeping silent until someone opposses them or their cause. That individual is not worthy of fighting for one if they can’t fight for the causes of others in simliar circumstances.

    YOU HARP ON CHARACTER A LOT. CHARACTER IS DOING WHAT IS RIGHT ALL OF THE TIME, NOT JUST WHEN IT SUITS YOU OR YOUR CAUSE. SO MUCH FOR CHARACTER AND SO MUCH FOR YOUR CAUSE.

  • badlybehaved

    And Obama , who no doubt KNOWS racism CHOOSE to take advantage of the sexism and allow it to flourish on his website. SO MUCH for his CHARACTER. The idea that black people should drink out of your water fountain or women should vote were also out of the mainstream.

  • badlybehaved

    Ps. I voted for McCain/Palin but it is the first time in my life I voted for a Republican.

  • Happydaysarehereagain

    Badly,

    At the risk of giving in to your sexist claims, would you like to share with me how Obama took advantage of sexism? would you be willing to demostrate how it “Flourished” on his website?

    If this was your fisrt time to vote (R) what made you switch?

  • badlybehaved

    I have various pictures that I downloaded directly from his website. They were posted elsewhere but I found them on my own. Any ten year old could have done the same. Perhaps Pundit will act as a go between and pass them on to you, I will submit them as an attachment.

    I voted against the Democratic party for two reasons (at least); voter disenfranchisement/caucus fraud; the assumption that all women would vote based only on their stance on abortion.

  • badlybehaved

    I sent the pictures to tips@ PUMA08.. there was a caption under the one of Bill Clinton that said “wanted for being black without a license..You aren’t Black until we say you are.” The mainstream media ignored this stuff.

  • Happydaysarehereagain

    Badly,

    I just don’t buy into the DNC conspiracy Fraud/ACron deal. I really do believe that people chose Obama over McCain. Simple as that. If you believe that OBAMA, the DNC, ACORN and other conspired to steal the election, that is something I just can’t buy. When you look at the exit polls, look at the cross-cultural bridges, look at the blocks that came together to elect Obama, I’m sorry, it just doesn’t go with what you’re alleging. IMHO, You are clearly dismissing the thousands of Americans who worked hard to secure change in this country. I don’t think the facts support your conclusions. If the DNC rigged the election on behalf of Obama, this would have been a maasive undertaking involving LIBS, FEMS, and others who are/were tradtional HRC supporters.

    Now I don’t doubt that you believe that there was fraud (your candidate loss and you can’t explain it). But please don’t dismiss as kool-aid drinkers those millions of others who voted FOR OBAMA.

    If you voted for MCCain, you really missed the mark there. His selection of Palin was to secure pissed off HRC supporters and you fell for it! She was not properly vetted, had no international knowledge and was VERY limited on national politics. It seems to me that your vote (and you are free to vote as you wish) was a dangerous game, done simply to stick a finger in the eye of the DNC and OBAMA. Although hindsight is 20/20, we all now know the Palin was wrong on sooooooo many levels.

    I am concerned about the thought that some seem to have which resembles a child’s tanturm in that (I’m going home if you don’t play by my rules). This seems to have the (R) party by the throat and is choking the life out of it. This (to me) is a much bigger concern than bashing Obama. The party is fractured and Steele and others must find somoeway to mend the divisions and present a united front. The (R) party can’t simply be the opposition party, they must be the party that offers a difference.

  • badlybehaved

    I’m always so happy to offer the documentation for the fraud; See GiGi Gaston’s film called We Will not be Silenced and the go to Lynette Long’s Caucus Fraud site. But you will not believe what you see and hear. You will dismiss the pictures from Obama’s website. I have yet to see one Obot willing to even look behind the curtain. That is what I mean when I say you choose to remain ignorant. I think many many childish millions had a temper tantrum about Bush and simply voted for this clown because he wasn’t Bush. I don’t expect you to buy it, it will be a looong time before your arrogance will allow you to admit you were duped.

  • Happydaysarehereagain

    Badly,

    I want to say that everyone has an agenda. I do, you do, Rush does, Michael Moore does. What I was expecting I guess, was some offer of proof of some sort of behavior on Obama’s part. YOU said he took advantage of sexism, you said he allowed things to flourish on his site. Please don’t give us some UBERFEMBOT documentary. Just the facts, please.

    Also, when you use terms like Obot and ignorance, without knowing my political view, you are the one being arrongant. How dare you judge or categorize me because I don’t follow some half-baked conspiracy. You were probably on the OBAMA IS NOT A CITIZEN Boat! You see, scream as you may, the truth always will come out. Whether or not you like it, he is our PREZ!

    It is not a tantrum to watch your child’s future being tied to an civil war between Shia and Sunni! It is pissant to scram like a little brat cuz you candidate loss. Now you will spend the next 4 years in a bitter, angry mood. Sounds like paradise to me.

  • Happydaysarehereagain

    Badly,

    I take no joy in your anger and bitterness. I understand that your dream of seeing someone else in the White House did not come true.

    I know you are searching for some sort of validation. Some sense of justice and fairplay. I know you have already decided to lay the blame of the world’s troubles at the feet of the new president.

    I see that your disgust is spread out to everyone and anyone who has anything positive to say about Obama. You and your ilk attack people for not believing what you believe and for not thinking the way you do. Yet, you want to try to scare others into thinking Obama idea of government is MORE dangerous than your type of mindset???

    To attack anyone’s character, one must be ready to open his breast for the same type of fate. ARE you ready???

  • Happydaysarehereagain

    BADLY,

    For every website, documentary, and other “piece of evidence” you refer me to, we can turn to the electoral college, exit polls and fundraising numbers. This amounts to opinions versus facts!If there were true cases of illegal acts, why didn’t these people bring them to the attention of FOX NEWS, RUSH LIMBAUGH, SEAN HANNITY? Are you telling me that NOT ONE REPUBLICAN D.A. ELECTION COMMISSIONER OR STATE SECRETARY THOUGHT nothing could come of this?

    The reason why is because (brace yourself)…it wasn’t true. Obama simply won. there are no monsters in the DNC Closet. HRC bypassed the small caucauses and played a bad hand. Face it, no conspiricay here.

  • Sparky

    Holy Smokes – what have I been missing here?!? I leave the website and it looks like we have an all out conversation full of sparks!

    Give me a couple of minutes to digest before I jump in!

  • Sparky

    Okay BB, I’m caught up with the reading. First of all you are absolutely correct to reference the c*nt t-shirts that were available on Barry’s website. They were in reference to Sarah Palin and so were the Bill Clinton items.

    HappyDaze will never admit to Barry’s fault because he is in denial. The man can do no wrong in his eyes. He will watch the United States crumble before our eyes and blame everyone else but Barry. You can only blame Bush for so long. At a certain point of time you need to look who is leading us into socialism.

    You see BB – HappyDaze is a socialist. You can read between his lines and know his objectives. So therefore he sees no faults with Obama’s trail of deceit. I suppose he will be singing the praises of Mohammed pretty soon too.

    It is true all of the famous personalities have an agenda – depending which side of the fence you are on – you will believe it – which makes you wonder why do you come here. We PUMAs have never changed our agenda – we will not support your faux Messiah.

    He is NOT the second coming of Christ!

    We march on….

  • Happydaysarehereagain

    Sparky,

    Glad you caught up. First of all you say that Obama is leading us into socialism? Let me tell you, we have had and will always have elements of Socialism in our society. Please tell me you are not too myopic to see that. If you don’t see this as being the truth, you are not honest enough to have a conversation with. so go get a life.

    If you are willing to admit that we readily accept some levels of socialism in our present day system, then we can talk. You and others who scream the alram bells and try to whip up the crowd are wasting your time. The vast majority of Americans see through your ptitful attempt to rally the troops. Well guess what, Altanta is on fire!

    Now, you can play the name-calling game, saying that I am in denial, making false (and pretty F&^*%ing dumb) statements about Mohammed, by the way, you are desparate aren’t you, but no matter how much you lie and distort the truth, Obama won, he is president, get over it. I could do the same by calling you a tin-foil hat wearer.

    you don’t have to support him. That is your right. but whenever you come up with some B.S. expect to be called on it. If your half-baked conspiracy theories and out-right lies don’t trip you up, your faulty character will.

  • Sparky

    HappyDaze – your truly are delusional..and a socialist. Perhaps the below will put things into perspective – then again with you – I highly doubt it.

    John Kennedy once said to a assembled group of scholars in the White House, “I think this is the most extraordinary collection of talent, of human knowledge, that has ever been gathered at the White House – with the possible exception of when Thomas Jefferson dined alone.”

    The quotes below could prove his point.

    When we get piled upon one another in large cities, as in Europe, we shall become as corrupt as Europe Thomas Jefferson

    The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from
    those who are willing to work and give to those who would
    not.
    - Thomas Jefferson

    It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes. A principle which if acted on would save one-half the wars of the world.
    - Thomas Jefferson

    I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.
    - Thomas Jefferson

    My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government.
    - Thomas Jefferson

    No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.
    - Thomas Jefferson

    The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to
    keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect
    themselves against tyranny in government.
    - Thomas Jefferson

    The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time
    with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
    - Thomas Jefferson

    Very Interesting Quote:

    In light of the present financial crisis, it’s interesting to read what Thomas Jefferson said in 1802:

    Banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will
    deprive the people of all property until their children
    wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.

    Doesn’t this sound eerily familiar to what is happening
    in America today?

    The late Dr. Adrian Rogers (1931 to 2005) offered the
    following observation several years ago and it bears poignant significance today:

    “You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the rich out of freedom. What one person receives without working for, another person must work without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend is about the end of any nation.

    You cannot multiply the wealth by dividing it.

    One more final note – you can not measure stupidity (yes I added this one…and with a smile directed your way).

  • Sparky

    One more for the road Happydaysaregone:

    Shouldn’t you be getting a new picture of Barry – I think the one you have now is ruined with your perpetual slobber.

    Better yet, why don’t you pull out your Pelosi and Barry dolls from underneath your pillow and take them to your holy grail location – the bathroom where you can worship them til your “hearts” delight.

  • badlybehaved

    Sorry; I get busy with other things…Sparky: Is Happy Daze Matt or just another adolescent boy…I think he’s must be having a real conflict with his proclaimed religious faith and voting for Obama but then who am I to say? Most interesting that he equates Jesus as the Messiah with being Godly to the exclusion of any other faith.
    Did you hear that the Wizard of OZama is taking care of Ms. Palin and the endangered animals that she hunts by enforcing the constitutional right to arm bears Oh Ah Um I guess that reads bear arms..

  • Sparky

    BB – you got me again! I have to quit drinking coffee and reading your post. Once again I burst out laughing with coffee going up my nose and on my keyboard.

    You are pretty sharp this morning…and yes, yes – I agree with you! :)

  • Sparky

    One more thing here BB – HappyDaze holds a double-standard. You can’t say anything about Barry or you are called a racist, but if you throw in anything about what happened to Palin or Hillary all of a sudden we are bitter and whiny females.

    How dare we gt up set that Barry-O from Hawaii Five-O posts shirts that say c*nt on them?

  • Carmelo Junior

    Bush never gave speeches. He won reelection based on actions and likeability. Bush was stronger than Kerry. Obama is just like Kerry but with better suit.