Barack Obama Plans to Use “Your” precious tax dollars on…

It saddens me that Obama still hasn’t grasped the fact that America is a capitalist nation that is guided by the tenets of the free enterprise system.

His dream of turning America into a Socialist utopia is naive and completely misguided.  I mean what else does one make of statements such as this one:

—ROADS AND BRIDGES: “[W]e will create millions of jobs by making the single largest new investment in our national infrastructure since the creation of the federal highway system in the 1950s. We’ll invest your precious tax dollars in new and smarter ways, and we’ll set a simple rule – use it or lose it. If a state doesn’t act quickly to invest in roads and bridges in their communities, they’ll lose the money.”

which he incidentally contradicts with this one

—SCHOOLS: “[M]y economic recovery plan will launch the most sweeping effort to modernize and upgrade school buildings that this country has ever seen. We will repair broken schools, make them energy-efficient, and put new computers in our classrooms. Because to help our children compete in a 21st century economy, we need to send them to 21st century schools.”

Maybe it’s just me, but how on earth do you prepare children to compete in a 21st century economy when your economic plan is to have a national work corps which consists of millions of day laborers?

Secondly, what sense does it make to take our tax dollars and force then upon communities that shall have to use them or lose them strictly for roads and bridges. What if in my community the main challenge is not having an additional road from the point A to point B, but having a better equipped hospital, school, or maybe post office?

Then he goes on to state:

—BROADBAND: “As we renew our schools and highways, we’ll also renew our information superhighway. It is unacceptable that the United States ranks 15th in the world in broadband adoption. Here, in the country that invented the Internet, every child should have the chance to get online, and they’ll get that chance when I’m president – because that’s how we’ll strengthen America’s competitiveness in the world.”

Putting broadband access in every home is a great idea, but why should our tax dollars be used for this purpose? Why not create additional tax incentives for corporations which decide to compete in the broadband arena?

I mean, I am really beginning to like the fact that Obama is full of ideas and energy, but he reminds me of a child with more energy than brains. His economic model would be appropriate for a third world nation trying to modernize itself pronto, but is completely inaplicable to America of the 21st century.

For those who care to see it, here’s the video of his broadcast where he stated these things (and more):

Incidentally, is it just me, or does anyone else feel like Obama’s weekly broadcasts from the “President-Elect” are like a comedy skit, which goes on and on without a punchline. I mean, surely, he can’t be serious, who on earth is going to pay for all this stuff?

Posted by PUMA Pundit

At times I feel like it's just me against the world...

  • Carmelo Junior

    Office of the President-Elect, what a joke! This man is so arrogant than even his OOTP-E is in Chicago, where else!! From Chicago he can mastermind all his craziness.
    All that rhetoric sounds like Fidel Castro when he took the Batista regime down. Obama can have his own American Bahia de Cochinos(Pigs Bay) right there in the capital of corruption.
    Yes, he will send 2.5 million laborers at 7 bucks an hour with free medical care to fix bridges and roads. Then he will send the kids of these laborers to new schools when they will have a computer each with “regulated” Internet access. Then he will establish a “paramilitary” corp of 250,000 Obamaniacs with cargo pants and purple shirts(from poor neighborhoods around the country) to make sure the Furher, I mean..”the messiah” ….mmmm… I mean….the President get re-elected.

  • Hiking4T

    It saddens me that PUMA Pundit is increasingly opposed to the same type of plans proposed by Hillary Clinton. Her Rebuild America plan promised to create good jobs and stimulate the economy by spending $10 billion on critical infrastructure repairs, provide $250 million to conduct safety reviews of high-risk infrastructure assets, and increase federal support to cities and states devising innovative solutions to congestion-reduction programs. (And not reward cities and states who don’t devise innovative solutions.)

    As Hillary said, “Let’s be clear: the degradation of our infrastructure isn’t just a serious threat to our safety – it is also a grave threat to our economy. It is time for us to rebuild America.”

    Your spin is that in order to rebuild America, it requires a Socialist Utopian workforce of millions of day laborers. Hmm, so what would you call the Americans put to work to improve critical infrastructure under Hillary’s plan?

    Hillary also voiced an urgency to increase our country’s broadband use. As her website says: “Under the Bush administration, the country that invented the Internet has slipped to 25th in the global rankings for broadband deployment. In order to accelerate the deployment of sophisticated networks, Hillary Clinton will provide tax incentives to encourage broadband deployment in underserved areas. She will also provide financial support for state and local broadband initiatives.”

    PUMA Pundit, your post makes it pretty clear that you think Obama and Hillary’s economic plan are misguided. Okay, so whose economic plan do you most support right now?

    And in your books, how important is improving our country’s infrastructure? How important is increasing the use of our country’s broadband availability? In the YouTube video posted above, Obama mentions the urgency to use the broadband to connect hospitals with each other to modernize our health care system and save lives. If that idea reminds you of a child with more energy than brains, than what’s your solution to improve health care system?

  • Happydaysarehereagain

    BRAVO, HIKING!

  • IndieDogg

    Beware of HIKING at high altitudes w/o an oxygen mask. Can cloud the brain.

    Who said Obama and Hillary Clinton were opposites? I certainly didn’t. During the primary, if you heard a position of hers, you’d heard it a week later, coming from Obama. Nobody has said (including the erudite PUMA Pundit) that HIllary didn’t like infrastructure. Or that McCain doesn’t like schools and highways.

    I like fudge. But, I wouldn’t spend every dime I have to build a fudge mountain and then borrow some more to build the biggest and grandest fudge mountain ever seen.

    Do you not hear this man talk? Everything he’s going to do (since I suppose he can issue royal edicts or wiggle his nose and all this will — poof — come true) has to be the greatest ever, the grandest in history, the most spectacular fudge mountain man has ever seen.

    I tell you what. If he’d spend Hillary’s $10 Billion and leave the rest alone, we should all thank our lucky stars. We’re talking about not billions but trillions of dollars, that we don’t have. Even all the greedy rich people don’t have enough, even if you hang them upside down and shake the change from their pockets.

    We’re not talking roads. We’re talking about the largest investment in roads and highways since the inception of the Interstate Highway System. Do you have any idea what that entails? And who’s going to do this work, the unemployed, unskilled worker? Do you know who repairs highways and bridges today? Not governments. Private contractors. Who know how to build a bridge. So, there won’t be teeming hordes of worker bees handed a bucket of asphalt or a bucket of rivets and told to march forth and repair America. It will merely be billions if not trillions of dollars paid to the same people who work on these facilities today.

    Schools? Not merely provide needed funds to schools for repairs, we’re talking about having the most modern schools every conceived. Paid for by…. again, whom and what?

    Not merely improve the penetration of Broadband, no. We’re going to see that every child in America can log onto this new Broadband network. Which means, they have to have a computer. For every child in America.

    Do you know how much money private companies and utilities have spent to complete a ubiquitous fiber network in this country? Billions. Who’s going to install this end-to-end Broadband network throughout America, in every home and every school? The same people who are out there doing it today. Not the mass of unskilled unemployed. And the cost?

    Some years ago, Chris Whittle, the founder of Whittle Communications, decided he could do a better job than the public school system (after all, not a very high bar to leap) and set out to build a network of private, state of the art schools around the nation, spending no more than the same per pupil cost as was being spent by the public school system. Not very many schools, but schools very much like those The Messiah is going to decree shall be. You’d think Moses was back with a new set of tablets and some celestial magic. Mr. Whittle was a visionary and no disrespect meant but he found out he needed to raise a tidy Billion Dollars in private financing (infrastructure is expensive and the per pupil cost is operating costs, not capital costs, which includes depreciation (from which funds are generated to replace fixtures and equipment and such) and that was the end of that. After he’d poured millions of his own money into research. A noble effort. But, EVERY school in America? Snap, zip, done?

    I don’t really care much what HIllary Clinton has to say these days. Many of us have moved on and hopefully up from there. But to compare her positions with those of the Golden Goose — when you consider the MAGNITUDE of what they have both said — is a non-starter.

    Hey. All of these things are admirable. As goals. And, yes, you have to start somewhere. But the point PUMA makes, and a good one, is that it’s simply ridiculous by it’s audacity. OR, to quote another Clinton, it’s a fairy tale.

    I understand that the elves are still jumping up and down and yelling hooray for whatever comes out of this man who’s never done a thing in his past life to suggest he will do much in the rest of it, other than get elected. But, excuse the rest of us who don’t think the way to fill up a hole is to dig faster.

    But, hey, good luck to you and your president. I certainly hope he is who he says he is and not who I think he is.

  • Carmelo Junior

    Hiking4T ,

    nobody who wants to modernize the Internet appoints an Internet regulator as Attorney General.
    Broadband is not the cure for school shootings, drugs trafficking and abusive teachers. Obama is talking as he was about to run a socialist country.
    Before giving each student a computer, why not ensure that these students are safe first? Why not investing in faith and values programs. Why not using the tax dollars in transform our kids in better citizens and persons? By telling them that a baby is a “punishment” Obama is infusing in kids the rejections of traditional values, transforming them in puppets of the politico social establishment.
    Yes, it is good to modernize but can we get some good values first? Hell, 50 years ago we didn’t have Internet but our schools were safe and drugs free campuses. We didn’t have teachers sexually abusing their students and getting away with it.

  • Hiking4T

    IndieDogg writes:

    “Beware of HIKING at high altitudes w/o an oxygen mask. Can cloud the brain.”

    Thanks for the shout out, IndieDogg. So I’ll ask you the same question I asked PUMA Pundit. Whose economic plan do you most support now? You’ve made it abundantly clear whose economic plans you don’t like so whose do you like?

    As ardent Hillary supporters know, she proposed her Rebuild America plan in August 2007. Since then, our economy has lost 1.8 million jobs. Last month alone, we lost 533,000 jobs, the biggest single month job loss since 1974. Since Hillary proposed her Rebuild America plan, our economy basically collapsed. As McCain put it, “We are in the most serious crisis since World War 2.”

    I hear you loud and clearly, IndieDogg. Hillary does not speak for you. As you said, “I don’t care what Hillary Clinton has to say nowadays.” Okay, so you disagree with Hillary when she said the degradation of our infrastructure is a grave threat to our economy and to our safety. So who does speak for you nowadays? In your opinion, which elected official or economist is offering the best proposals to deal with a collapsing economy that has lost 1.8 million jobs in the past year?

  • bigwin

    Puma Pundit will oppose any plan Obama proposes to stimulate the economy. Their hatred of Obama is so ingrained that they pray for that his administration fail. But, they will be very disappointed when the economy starts to boom in two years.

  • Happydaysarehereagain

    Carmelo,

    Wake up please. The things that are going on in schools today were happening 50 years ago. Don’t be blind. There were gays then, there are gays now. There were wife beaters and cheaters then, as there is now. The main reasons the republicans lost were (a) the economy which W. ran into the ground, and (b) because of the tired rhetoric which sounds like this…blah, blah blah, mainstream values…..terrorists won’t get away, blah, blah, blah…America….blah, blah, blah……

    We have a a lot of work to do to get this country back on the right track. One thing we don’t need is to start pointing fingers and pretending that today’s problems don’t have roots in the past.

    When we can say goodbye to our prejudices, and biases, and learn to accept differences in our choices we will be on our way to making this country truly great.

  • Sheryl

    Hiking4T

    One thing, it does not matter much whether the new guy agrees with Hilary or not.

    I don’t trust him period….

  • Hiking4T

    Sheryl:

    I came to this website because I have big reservations about both political parties. I thought this would be a good forum to have an honest dialogue with like-minded people.

    What I like is that all opinions are welcome. Yes, that means some posters tend to butt heads with one another. But frankly I think it’s healthy to see how other people think. For you, it doesn’t matter whether Obama agrees with Hillary on any number of issues, you just don’t like him. Other posters here will never trust Sarah Palin no matter what she says or does. C’est la vie.

    What I’m most curious about is which elected officials posters on this website DO trust. For you, who is offering the best solution to deal with the worst financial crisis since WW2 and 1.8 million lost jobs in the past year?