Sarah Palin On Those Behind the Rumors: “They’re Cowards and Jerks…”
November 8, 2008 by PUMA Pundit
Since we do not wish Barack Obama ill, except he is impeached, we see him serving out his first term, and definitely running for his second. If by some miracle he does serve two terms, based on his megalomania, we see him attempting to pull a Bloomberg and extend Presidential term limits from 2 to 3.
What this simply means is that the chances of Hillary Clinton ever being President of the Unites States are virtually non-existent.
So, having said that, who do we think has what it takes to take Barack Obama down if not Hillary Clinton? Why Sarah Palin of course.
She is a real person, smart, humble, capable and actually has lots of substance to her. She not only talks the talk, but also walks the walk. The MSM in continuing their new role as the Press Corp for the Obama White House have decided to take Sarah Palin down to diminish whatever competition she might give Obama in 2012. As a result, in the last week we’ve heard all sorts of extremely awful and ridiculous rumors about her, rumors which we won’t even bother repeating here.
Anyway, good news is that Sarah has a voice, and actually isn’t afraid to use it, here is what she has to say:
and here’s video of her back at work as Governor of Alaska…
Wait, she is talking about the price of oil, fiscal conservatism? I thought the MSM made it seem like she was an airhead.
She also talks about the clothes issue. Funny thing is that there is nothing she said that we don’t already know.
Anyway, here’s to Sarah and we hope she runs in 2012…
Posted by PUMA Pundit
There is a site that pumas may be interested in.
http://www.teamsarah.org
Sarah 2010
I think Barack Obama is forcing the issue of impeachment by using the excess money from his presidential run, aka the plus 200 million dollars in undocumented funds, to damage the reputation of other future presidential competitors such as Palin.
The only thing so far that concerns me about Palin, was her telling Alaska political contributors to not contribute during this year’s contest.
http://www.DailyPUMA.com
Assuming that that last accusation is true, that is a doozy, but I don’t mean to imply that it is true, just more heresay.
That’s exactly what my thoughts were when those jerks immediately attacked Palin following their big election “success”.
If she posed no threat to the Dems, like they claim, they’d have laid off of her a long time ago.
Since they’ve ramped up the attacks and are getting much more personal, you KNOW they consider her their greatest threat in 2012 or sooner.
His Presidency is not legitimate!
Wow, bliondgenes, sadly you are once again showing your ignorance. Have you not heard that it was insiders from the McCain camp, not the Dems, who leaked the stories about Palin to the media? How said that you are so blinded by your ignorance, and whoa, it sure shows here.
Haven’t already embarrassed yourself enough?
Want more?
I want to know what or who are the PUMAs. Are you just against Obama or the whole democratic party left? Hillary’s future is not as bright now as Sarah’s. Obambi might just send the Clintons to the trash can again. I’d love to see this travesty fraud-elect president mess up bad and Hillary challenging him in 2012.
Be certain that Sarah will be the GOP nominee in 2012. Her approval ratings between conservatives and republicans is over 60% while the closest contenders Romney and Huckabee can’t get out the basement.
I’m for Sarah Palin 2012, and have been tempted to say “Sarah Palin 2010″ since if all of the fraud and corruption were properly investigated, there is a reasonable change that Obama would be removed from office . Of course, the fraude and corruption will nt be properly investigated.
In any event, we really need to elect Republicans in 2010 to house and senate. If the Obama people were smart, which by definition they are not, they would have at least voted in Republicans for the house and senate to balance power.
Anyone who believes Palin is “dumb” is too gullible and stupid to even converse with on an intelligent level. That is totally manufactured information and to believe it is to be beyond education on any issue.
I’m for Sarah Palin 2012, and have been tempted to say “Sarah Palin 2010″ since if all of the fraud and corruption were properly investigated, there is a reasonable change that Obama would be removed from office . Of course, the fraude and corruption will nt be properly investigated.
In any event, we really need to elect Republicans in 2010 to house and senate. If the Obama people were smart, which by definition they are not, they would have at least voted in Republicans for the house and senate to balance power.
Anyone who believes Palin is “dumb” is too gullible and stupid to even converse with on an intelligent level. That is totally manufactured information and to believe it is to be beyond education on any issue.
“Cowards and jerks.” Yes. I couldn’t have said it better. If there is any goal as important as party reform, it is media reform. The MSM played the MOST important role in this primary and general election. They were the messenger and the message.
With the power of the “medium,” the “free press” distorted and repeated allegations about Obama’s “opponents.” With Hillary, it was the repetition of her Bosnia experience and her comments about R.F.K.’s assassination. Of course, there were the repeated snide remarks about her “bitchiness,” her wardrobe, and her appearance, coupled with crude remarks about what “Bill” would do if allowed in the White House once again. With Sarah, the media repeatedly portrayed her as “stupid” (by editing clips and laying mines) and opportunistic (just there for clothes and photo ops.). Somehow, her “inexperience” was more important than Obama’s “inexperience.” Meanwhile, Obama was able to “whitewash” his associations with Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, and Rezko. His policies were never questioned. His “experience” was never questioned. His past was never examined. His questionable fundraising was never investigated.
So…here is the challenge. There are many VERY FINE writers who contribute to these blogs. I would hope that several of you could collaborate on a book detailing the media bias and its impact on this election. I think it would be a best seller. I think it would be a textbook for journalism classes. I think it would (when promoted properly in the media) produce long-needed reforms in journalistic ethics.
I think it should be called “Physician, Heal Thyself: A Self-Help Manual for the Narcisstic Journalist.” (OR: “How I Learned to Stop Lying by Telling the Truth.)
Obama is only President elect after the Electoral College meets in December, and if the candidate in question is found to be of questionable citizenship, the Constitution, Amendment XX, Section 3 kicks in.
Pass these petition websites along, to call for Obama’s proof of citizenship/eligibiity to be investigated and to resist Obama’s “change”;
http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244/stop-obama-constitutional-crisis/
http://www.grassfire.org/111/petition.asp?pid=18651528
Carmelo Junior–Brilliant questIon as I thought this site was all about supporting Hillary’s political future. But no, even after the election, the true colors have come out–everyone here is a conservative Republican who are supporting Palin??????
Gojo,
Supporting Hillary’s political future?
No, the issue is much bigger than that.. the goals more lofty.
Obozo and the Democratic elite sold out Hillary. Her best chance for VP was with him but he showed his true sexist colors and went for white male.
After that her best chance was for President 2012…. Obozo had to lose for that to happen. Now she is locked out of the top slot until 2016 but that is a long way off… I think her chance to break the glass ceiling to highest office in the world is over now.
Our next best hope is Sarah in 2012. She is wiser of the rampant sexism which exists in the Democratic Elite and the Useful Idiots in broadcasting. In 48 months our day will come.
Go Sarah 2012!!!!
One does have to wonder GoBozo, what bots are doing still coming here. You really need to know that the CIA and Homeland Security threats make people question your stability. Now you add to it the need for ‘rules’ of this site; No one here is required to think or not think anything. The reason I put up with people like you (many sites don’t) is because1. It may be your last best chance to see freedom of speech at it’s best and 2. Sometimes Bots expose themselves for who they really are (i.e. your Homeland Security and CIA comments).
As for the Palin v Hillary question in 4 years; I actually don’t know what I’d do at this point; a lot can happen in 4 years; I do know that the Democrats will never have my automatic vote again. I’m hoping the moderates of both parties begin to have a more relevant voice and THAT will eventually evolve into unity and bi-partisanship.
In the meantime I will probably do some ‘feminist affirmative action’ as far as giving women extra credit for my vote. Why is this country ranked 69th in the world for women in political office? I will work for the ERA or whatever is necessary so that the sexism that undermined both Hillary and Sarah’s candidacies will not happen again.
The bottom line here is that Hillary Clinton did not run as a woman but as the clearly most qualified candidate for office but she was defeated because she was a woman. I believe that not only did Barack Obama benefit from that sexism but actually encouraged it by saying nothing during his anything-necessary- to- win campaign.
The Roe v Wade scare tactics to me were like giving a slave the choice of which plantation preferred.
“The reason I put up with people like you (many sites don’t) is because1. It may be your last best chance to see freedom of speech at it’s best and 2. Sometimes Bots expose themselves for who they really are (i.e. your Homeland Security and CIA comments).” — quote from badlybehaved.
badlybehaved–Oh, I am so beholden to you for “putting up with me”
Yes, it works both ways, doesn’t it? I didn’t know this site belonged to an exclusive group of people. I thought this was a site that was created for Hillary supporters. It certainly has morphed and become a hate website that thinks it is okay to make insinuating threats against OUR president-elect. Yes, you are right, this site does expose people for who they really are, and it’s always pretty.
The stock market is certainly not fairing well under the BO regime.
Down, down, down we go, where it stops nobody knows.
Messiah, Messiah, wherefore art thou Messiah?
I’m out spreading the manure, excuse me the wealth my son.
Pelosi and BO are extremely anxious to bail out GM, Hmm, makes one believe they struck a pre-election deal with Hoffa, a Chicago Crony btw.
F.Y.I. The “BO regime” does not take place until January…what else would y’all like to pin on him? Give the guy a shot. I can’t wait til you all have to eat your words. The fact that you all supported Hillary or Sarah just because they are women is the same as an African American supporting Barack just because he is black. Which I’m sure you have criticized because that’s all you do on this site is bitch and moan!!!
JoeBlowsO - you are right the site did morph. It’s true - we do hate you. Loser!
GoBozo: You’re wrong about that; this site is about refusing to vote for OBozo but I understand if the little voices in your head that told you to alert the CIA and Homeland Security told you other things too. Please take your Abilify.
so, goblowjoe, it’s alrite for you to make threats using homeland security to call the dogs? the same program you prolly complained about. it’s kinda like b. ayers blowing up the police dept. then calling on them for help. please go somewhere else w/your rage tactics.
this review by Paglia on Salon.com was insightful concerning Sarah. Here is a excerpt…
“Liberal Democrats are going to wake up from their sadomasochistic, anti-Palin orgy with a very big hangover. The evil genie released during this sorry episode will not so easily go back into its bottle. A shocking level of irrational emotionalism and at times infantile rage was exposed at the heart of current Democratic ideology — contradicting Democratic core principles of compassion, tolerance and independent thought. One would have to look back to the Eisenhower 1950s for parallels to this grotesque lock-step parade of bourgeois provincialism, shallow groupthink and blind prejudice.
I like Sarah Palin, and I’ve heartily enjoyed her arrival on the national stage. As a career classroom teacher, I can see how smart she is — and quite frankly, I think the people who don’t see it are the stupid ones, wrapped in the fuzzy mummy-gauze of their own worn-out partisan dogma. So she doesn’t speak the King’s English — big whoop! There is a powerful clarity of consciousness in her eyes. She uses language with the jumps, breaks and rippling momentum of a be-bop saxophonist. I stand on what I said (as a staunch pro-choice advocate) in my last two columns — that Palin as a pro-life wife, mother and ambitious professional represents the next big shift in feminism. Pro-life women will save feminism by expanding it, particularly into the more traditional Third World.
As for the Democrats who sneered and howled that Palin was unprepared to be a vice-presidential nominee — what navel-gazing hypocrisy! What protests were raised in the party or mainstream media when John Edwards, with vastly less political experience than Palin, got John Kerry’s nod for veep four years ago? And Gov. Kathleen Sebelius of Kansas, for whom I lobbied to be Obama’s pick and who was on everyone’s short list for months, has a record indistinguishable from Palin’s. Whatever knowledge deficit Palin has about the federal bureaucracy or international affairs (outside the normal purview of governors) will hopefully be remedied during the next eight years of the Obama presidencies.
The U.S. Senate as a career option? What a claustrophobic, nitpicking comedown for an energetic Alaskan — nothing but droning committees and incestuous back-scratching. No, Sarah Palin should stick to her governorship and just hit the rubber-chicken circuit, as Richard Nixon did in his long haul back from political limbo following his California gubernatorial defeat in 1962. Step by step, the mainstream media will come around, wipe its own mud out of its eyes, and see Palin for the populist phenomenon that she is.”
Go Sarah 2012!!!
As a Clinton supporter, no way I want Palin in there. Palin is the reason we (PUMAs) lost the election! She represents the worst of the Republican party: the creationist antiabortion religious nutball wing. If we are to defeat Obama we need someone more centrist. I hope this site doesn’t turn into a Palin rag.
Eric,
That’s fine to support Hillary.. unfortunately she wasn’t on the ticket to compete against the Obozo…. and won’t challenge him 2012…
.. by the way, who did you vote for?
Go Sarah 2012!!!
Everyone
Forget what gojo says about homeland security and the CIA…… like the Obozo our friend gojo has an overinflated view of self-importance.
Just have a chuckle about the worth of such kool-aid drinkers!!
Go Sarah 2012!!!
I was talking about 2012 when I said no Palin for Pres. I voted for McCain this election, in spite of Palin.
As a Clinton supporter, obviously I am not going to support Palin on any policy considerations. The Republicans need to go more moderate in 2012, get back to their fiscal conservatism. If it’s Obama vs Palin in 2012 I will vote for a third-party candidate.
At any rate, I’m not here to talk about Palin.
Eric,
Not here to talk about Palin?
Why you already have!
Frankly, I am for a “competent, qualified, glass-shattering once and for all” woman in the top position even if I might disagree on a few particulars… it was Hillary’s time but she got broadsided by sexism in the Democratic Party and in the media… in a weakened position she accepted some hidden deal with the Obozo.. time will tell what it was… but her time has now passed for the number 1 or 2 slot.
Therefore, the woman on the scene who can lead the way is Sarah Palin… abortion is not the litmus test.. that is only what the Democratic elite want women to believe. It’s an old tasteless chewy bone but they keep sprinkling honey on it and it works for them… they could care less about the substantive issues concerning women.. in fact, they are downright afraid of them.
So I will put my energy into seeing Sarah Palin smash that glass ceiling once and for all..
Go Sarah 2012!!!
We’ll agree to disagree on the fundamental competence of Palin. I am here for more general PUMA stuff, not because I have any support for Palin (I don’t).
I posted here as I was concerned that PUMA was becoming a Palin surrogate. But a couple of PUMA folks here have assured me (in person and email) that it isn’t the case, that they don’t support women blindly, but want competent women like Hillary. I don’t want to be like the Obama supporters that just voted for him because he is black. I don’t care what gender or race you are, or about any glass ceiling. I want the best. Hillary was the best (head and shoulders and mountains above Palin), and I am here to continue to support Clinton, and to redirect attention to the horrors of Obama so someone else has a chance in 2012.
So this will be my last post about Palin. She dragged McCain down, and I just want to forget about her for the time being and hope the Republicans can do better in 2012.
Jamaica Man, get it right - Nobama is bi-racial. And there doesn’t have to be a “regime” for Wall Street to react. Just the thought of Nobie actually taking the oath is making investors run for the hills………….
Eric, you are so typical of the far left - clueless. Palin prevented McCain from a 10 point loss. Look what your party did to your beloved Hillary - 2012 will be no different. The left hates Sarah because they are afraid of her. And they should be…………she’s the future, get used to it. You have to - your party and the biased MSM is never going to let Hillary back in. Sorry!!!
To blondegenes–
Obama has more threats than other presidents-elect
By EILEEN SULLIVAN, Associated Press Writer Eileen Sullivan, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON – Threats against a new president historically spike right after an election, but from Maine to Idaho law enforcement officials are seeing more against Barack Obama than ever before. The Secret Service would not comment or provide the number of cases they are investigating. But since the Nov. 4 election, law enforcement officials have seen more potentially threatening writings, Internet postings and other activity directed at Obama than has been seen with any past president-elect, said officials aware of the situation who spoke on condition of anonymity because the issue of a president’s security is so sensitive…In the security world, anything “new” can trigger hostility, said Joseph Funk, a former Secret Service agent-turned security consultant who oversaw a private protection detail for Obama before the Secret Service began guarding the candidate in early 2007…The service investigates threats in a wide range. There are “stated threats” and equally dangerous or lesser incidents considered of “unusual interest” — such as people motivated by obsessions or infatuations or lower-level gestures such as effigies of a candidate or an elected president. The service has said it does not have the luxury of discounting anything until agents have investigated the potential danger.
On no GoJoe say it isn’t so…..if he gets hurt then who would you then blow….
Loser!
Sparky–You are truly sick in the mind–a #1 PERVERT!!!!!!!!!!!! No one else on this website spews out such filth as you, time and time again. And to think you try to portray yourself as a person with a brain. Who do you associate with? Perverts?? You really need to retreat to your den of filth and get off of this website. BTW, you loser, I wasn’t directing my comment to you so STAY OUT OF IT unless you have something intelligent to say. Oh sorry, we’ve established already you are not capable of making an intelligent argument here. Look at your past comments and name calling. Next time your name appears on this site, I’ll make sure to look past it as it won’t be worth my time. Grow up and act civil.
goblowjoe: First of all you voted for Obama; I don’t know whether it is because you are a blindly loyal democrat or just too lazy to look into Obama. Maybe you don’t know it YET or maybe you’ll never be able to admit it but you showed some very poor judgment just like Obama himself. At the very least your guy stole the nomination from Hillary and has shown an utter lack of leadership. I have put some thought into human behavior and am wondering why on earth Obama supporters would come to this site; I think it is a case protesting too much; On some level you know Obama is a snark or else you wouldn’t be wasting your time here when you could be a deputized CIA helper. I think that if anyone were planning to threaten Obama all they would do is slip him some coke; after all, his brain is already primed from his history of drug abuse. Maybe you could help Homeland Security eliminate drugs in order to protect Obama, Keep a sharp eye on the KoolAid!
Your use of the editorial ‘we” is awfully presumptuous; You are the one not welcome here. Except you do say a lot of things that lead me to question your mental status. Depakote? Seroquel? Abilify? Whatever, You are not doing OK!
Hey Sparky Matt is back; You know the 12 year-old that gets a naughty feeling running up his leg when he says vagina. Your ignorance is shouting once again but once again we are all glad that you have both your hands on the keyboard; wouldn’t want all those billions of unwanted potential babies dying an agonizing death on your Kleenex.