I’m beyond disgusted with the MSM’s coverage of this election and I’ve made a determination of action that I’m hoping many of you might join me in joining in.
I don’t know how many PUMA’s there are out there (who aren’t voting for BO), but hopefully enough to make at least a dent.

What I’m proposing is an OUTRIGHT ban on ALL liberal media, including radio, tv, print, online… EVERYTHING! People (whatever their core politcal position) have not received fair and accurate information by the general media in order to make an educated decision, instead they’ve recieved what the MSM WANTED them to recieve to make the decision THEY wanted them to make. Some were automatically hypnotized by the BO syndrome and would have gone that way anyway. But others, who may have made different decisions based on accurate, ‘uncut’ presentation of information, will vote for BO because they’ve received the MSM version. I reiterate that I’m a registered Independent who would have voted for Hill, but after she was out, I became a PUMA, and will now be voting for McPalin.

We ‘vote’ for something when we support it with our dollars, and in this case, we need to write letters, make calls, send emails, and STOP SUPPORTING THE MSM!!!!!!!!!! I’m not sure which news outlets are a legitimate alternative, (if anyone knows of some, please post), which gives you an unbiased view, it seems only liberal or conservative. The liberals are looking at reinstating “The Fairness Doctrine’, which, since the media is controlled by liberals, with the exception of Fox News or AM radio, means that no ‘non-liberal’ news will be available, which is censorship.

I’m telling you, they’ve hijacked the media, the political process, and they are on the brink of hijacking the ENTIRE Federal Government, with the Senate/Congress/Presidency and (soon the Supreme Court) with a veto-proof Far-left Democratic majority. Surely noone but an absolute socialist can think THAT’S not good for the country! (Sounds like an Ayers/Weather Underground fantasy to me!). What happened to Checks and Balances?

Anyway, please PUMA’s, let’s work to take a stand against this craziness!

I think I have to agree with your description. I am a PUMA follower, not a leader, but I have noticed how it seems that more and more, there are views expressed here that really don’t seem to follow Hillary’s views. I have never felt like writing in, but thanks for summing it up and reminding us all, NL. I wonder how others feel about this as I was surprised that an article written by Michele Malkin was brought up. I didn’t read it but I know I have seen her a lot on FOX. I didn’t think that FOX people were very nice to Hillary.

Your perceptions are shared by (probably) all Pumas. However, we must take one step at a time. First, the election. If “The One” loses, it will give us a much larger arena to push for reform in the Democratic electoral process, as well as its leadership.

If we accomplish this goal, our next target is the MSM. There will be no “Mission Accomplished” banner here until that objective is realized. Undoubetdly, the MSM is to blame for its coverage, as well as its “covering of” Obama throughout this election cycle. The “third estate,” currently, is nothing but a tenement occupied by rats. Obviously, the tenement needs to be razed and replaced by something more suitable to the “landscape.”

Vote Nobama. Get at least three more people to vote Nobama with you. Currently, I have six. (PA)