javascript hit counter

Yippee! Obama/Biden promote Palin from Mayor to Lt. Governor…

September 4, 2008 by PUMA Pundit 

Hallelujah! Palin has been promoted! Speaking to reporters today, Joe Biden had the following wise words:

“And the other thing I heard, I heard a very - by the way, I mean this sincerely - a very strong and a very good political speech from a lieutenant governor of Alaska, who I think is going to be very formidable, very formidable.”

Good news is, at this rate, he’ll soon be calling her President…

Comments

17 Responses to “Yippee! Obama/Biden promote Palin from Mayor to Lt. Governor…”

  1. jwl6 on September 4th, 2008 3:33 pm

    Actually it’s a downgrade from Governor to Lt. Governor, but whatever.

    Important post. Really contributing to the national argument.

    You guys are so classy!

    get ready for 8 years of Obama, b*#@*s!!!!

    —-
    jwl6,
    First and Last Warning
    Use profanity again and you shall be banned.
    Thanks!

  2. Sparky on September 4th, 2008 3:42 pm

    Hey jwl6, I thought you were leaving this page? Can’t keep your word, kind of like your fearless leader!

  3. mature on September 4th, 2008 7:25 pm

    hey Sparky what’s McCain plans on the Economy?

    A: Drill Here
    B: Drill There
    C: Drill Now
    D: All of the above

    gosh this a tough one

  4. DianeB on September 4th, 2008 9:27 pm

    McCain and Palin are anti-choice. Palin is opposed to abortion even in the case of rape and incest. She is against sex education in the schools. McCain and Palin are not champions of women’s rights, and, although McCain may think they are equivalent, Palin is no Hillary Clinton!

  5. Sparky on September 5th, 2008 5:33 am

    Actually mature, I work for an environmental engineeering firm and he is dead right on this one. 50 miles away off the coast of Louisiana you have other countries drilling and taking our oil. 50 miles from Alaska, Russia is drilling our oil. They are building their reserves. They are taking OUR oil.

    We need short term goals of drilling to provide for long term goals for alternative energy.

    You are denial if you don’t see this.

  6. mature on September 5th, 2008 7:10 am

    so Sparky, let me get this rite. Drilling is going to solve our bad economy problem? Energy prices added to our problem but was not the sole problem. Please don’t try to spin me, it a waste of time. We need to deal with everything that caused this problem. I promise you Drilling won’t solve this alone. So get McCain to come up with the Solution to resolve the other 99 problems and I’ll listen

  7. mature on September 5th, 2008 7:16 am

    And who told you the open waters on earth was all for America. McCain has voted against Alternative Energy all his yrs in senate and now he’s all for it? I’ll go with his record on this one. Oil companies own McCain Now. No Way No How No McCain. Thanks Hillary yeppee

  8. Sparky on September 5th, 2008 8:05 am

    Mature you can not rationalize with the irrational and that is what your comments are, thtey don’t even make sense. You obviously don’t know enought about the subject to even provide a plausible argument.

    Ask the majority of Americans if they want to drill? Ask them if they want to be dependent on foreign oil.

    The last refinery was the Mobil refiner built in 1978. Our refineries are old, we haven’t tapped into new areas and with Russia becoming more powerful with their oil and providing assistance to countries like Iran and formerly Iraq, you are missing the boat on what is actually going on here.

    Short term goals drill, long term goals Alternative Energy, this should have happend years ago, but it hasn’t.

    Go back to reading Alice in Wonderland.

  9. Sparky on September 5th, 2008 8:06 am

    …and try not to go off on the mis-spellings - they are there, obviously I typed to fast - perhaps the college profesors can step in and provide lessons.

  10. mature on September 5th, 2008 9:57 am

    Sparky
    This is why i say you are stupid. Most American wanted to go to WAR with Iraq because we were told, it was for our protection and they had WMDs. 69% to be exact. 72% of American think Drilling will change gas Prices next year. Because retard like you keep saying it’s going to give us energy independent from foreign countries. It’s laughable. How much oil do we have in America? 3% of the worlds oil. We take in 25% of the worlds oil. Please don’t let these numbers hurt your head, just read very slowly. These Oil companies have millions of aces of lands that they have not touched for years. What are they holding these lands for? Why don’t you fight for them to start drilling on what they have already. That’s drilling i will support.

  11. Sparky on September 5th, 2008 11:11 am

    My husband actually works for Shell Oil Company, and I am not sure where you picked up your numbers - perhaps from an Obama contributor, perhaps the local comic books, but you are sadly misinformed.

    By the way, calling people names like “stupid”, just represents that you are a product of your environment.

    Please keep spinning for every per centage you come up with, there are 30 other counter numbers.

    Spin, spin, troll, troll…..

  12. Renshaw on September 5th, 2008 1:20 pm

    Sparky, now we see your real face. Your husband works for oil. It’s your bread and butter. By the way, which country does the land under the water 50 miles from the Alaska shore belong to? Is it ours? Is it true that if we start drilling in the next year or two, our gas prices will drop? By how much? And all those tens of thousands of off shore acres that are already ready to be drilled by the oil companies legally are not being drilled right now why?

    Maybe if we can close the Enron loophole and stop the speculators from profiteering on this crisis may help more. Maybe we can follow some of what Palin has suggested and move towards natural gas powered autos for now to move toward renewable energy sources and energy independence.

    I’m sorry, Sparky. People are having to decide whether to eat or buy gas for their cars so they can get to work. This is hurting real people. Your livelihood is based on the real misery of others. I hope you can sleep at night.

  13. Sparky on September 5th, 2008 1:52 pm

    Renshaw, you are quite ignorant. I actually work for an Environmental firm. We have a joke in our house, he makes the mess, and I clean it up. I actually - GASP - make more money than he does.

    Can you believe it - a woman that makes more money than her husband. Almost like not believing a woman can run for your party on a presidential ticket, made more money than her husband and flat out disrespected.

    Now the democratic party is groveling for her assistance.

    They may be pushing her for help, but we won’t give your boy Nobama any asistance. My vote may be one, but combined, I hope we put McCain on the ticket and show the DNC that our votes really do matter.

  14. Sparky on September 5th, 2008 1:54 pm

    The Enron deal had little to do with oil and more to do with financials. They over inflated the value of their stock.

    Go back and study the facts instead of spinning issues that are out of your realm of understanding.

  15. GAPEACH on September 5th, 2008 2:00 pm

    so what is the environmental impact of offshore drilling?

  16. Sparky on September 5th, 2008 3:20 pm

    What about the environmental impact? One major concern is aesthetic—voters (and the tourism industry in states like Florida) just don’t want oil rigs sullying their coastline. Offshore oil production also produces its share of greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution and poses a hazard to seabirds. And while large spills may be rare, platforms do release “produced formation water” and drilling mud, among other materials, that might be toxic to marine life. (platforms also attract their own fish.) Still, producing oil is a dirty business regardless of where it happens, and it’s worth noting that more oil spills into the water from transporting the stuff than drilling it.

    Whether we do it or not, the other countries are already doing it. They are there.

  17. SummertimeBlues on September 9th, 2008 11:25 pm

    I will now take you back to the original article. AD76 (please get a better pseudonym) was unhappy that Joe Biden called Sarah Palin a Lieutenant Governor. I agree, we should all respect her for fully governing that big state next to Russia, with so much oil and gas, which receives so much federal money, and has a really big budget that it mostly gives directly back to its residents (a la Hugo Chavez).

    Sarah Palin is now a bigger celebrity than Obama. But her past remains a bit vague to some supporters, so I’ll provide a fact.

    She ran for Lieutenant Governor of Alaska in 2002. Alas, she was defeated. Who knew that in 6 years she’d be an RNC superstar? Alaska’s voters saw a former point guard, beauty queen, sports reporter, book banner, and decided that “hockey mom” wasn’t quite enough qualification.

    This was a little like Major League Baseball deciding in 1992 that George W Bush was unqualified to be Commisioner (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commissioner_of_Baseball).

    I think the baseball owners made a very sound choice. Unfortunately this freed Bush to do a whole lot of damage to the planet. We have hundreds of thousands of dead Iraqis, two million refugee Iraqis, over four thousand dead Americans, and counting. If you don’t care about the Iraqis, please just think about the Americans.

    Let’s hope Sarah is unable to repeat George’s history by going from a loss of a minor office to world domination and destruction. Would she BombBomb Iran because she thinks it’s the only way to trigger rapture? The Lord and many of my Christian friends know that far dumber things have been done in his name.

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

vpn services Proxy Buy mp3 music