“A point I would like to make is why is there so much
controversy over Pro- Choice or Pro-Life – Each woman and man should take individual responsibility for unwanted pregnancy. What with today all of the easy birth control methods available, who needs abortion? Who would want to have an abortion when pregnancy is so easily prevented, you know with the morning after pill???
Sarah Palin believes that abortion should be legal in case of rape, incest or threat to a mothers life and that is what I believe also.
Why is this even an issue????????????”

Are you f****ing kidding me? Wow… what a lying, large sack of excrement you are!

Sarah Palin is ANTI-CHOICE (aka anti-abortion). She ONLY makes exceptions when the life of the mother is in danger and ONLY then. This is well documented everywhere!

This site is disgusting in every way shape and form. I’m sure if McCain-Palin win in November and Hilary returns to run in 2012, she would absolutely want nothing to do with you people. You know… that is if we still have a planet in 2012 after McCain and Palin push the button and fire nukes at Iran, North Korea and Russia… and Russia fires nukes right back at the US.

Then again… this is assuming that this isn’t yet just another sickening faction of the vast Right Wing Conspiracy… and if it isn’t you are all are now a complicit part of it.

That IS a partial birth abortion the part you get wrong is that it is terminated in the cervix and then has to be induced out. And in almost all cases where it is legal it is used as a last resort in potentially fatal pregnancy. It’s not birth-control. And it’s almost .1 of all abortions. Do your research.

And if you need an example of how much damage a bad president can do, turn on the news. It’s called the last eight years.”

Again, I am not a one-issue voter. I don’t like “abstinence only” education, I believe in evolution, etc. but those are just part of the picture. I am still undecided and may still vote for the Obama/Biden ticket (not happily, but I’m never entirely happy with my choices!).

There is a difference between “partial-birth abortion” and what I’m referring to; as I understand it, sometimes in an induced-labor abortion, in which the fetus is expected to be delivered dead, it is delivered with a heartbeat, i.e. alive. The question is what to do then. You can Google it yourself if you want to read about it. I doubt you do.

Of course I’m worried about how much damage a bad president can do (especially with a weak-willed Congress). I am, seriously, worried as to how much damage Sen. Obama could do over the next four or eight years, because I think the Democratic Congress would follow his lead without question much more than it would with a Republican President. I also have very serious economic concerns; I think the budget and national debt would expand even more. I agree the Bush administration has been terrible, I never voted for him, I think maybe he should have been impeached. But that does not mean the Democratic candidate automatically gets my vote. I am genuinely still undecided; reading the policy platforms of both parties, such things as the “troopergate” report in October, any candidate might say or do something extraordinarily problematic, etc. will affect my vote.

This an example of exageration. The term is partial-birth abortion, and you do not leave the baby to die.

And if you need an example of how much damage a bad president can do, turn on the news. It’s called the last eight years.

This is great. Here is the “Country First” McCain (McBush) choice for VP. She wants to secede from the union. The group is saying that Palin was a member of their group in the 90′s. That’s only about 10 years ago. If they’re going to fry Obama about attending Wright’s church or Biden from copying some Brit’s line for a speech about twenty-five years ago – why does Palin get a free pass from this?

The woman is a problem!

Here’s the link:

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/09/members-of-frin.html